https://www.pscp.tv/w/1ypJdgWRMwdGW

By giving laws to specific groups like LGBT, black people, white people, etc. We're all human beings so the discrimination will also be applied to all of us as such

Meaning you'd be for this summer's decision I was talkin about ?

No because that's increasing government control, they should have already been covered you didn't need to add anything to the law in order to cover them. You're treating them like they're not human beings by saying all we have to add in homosexuality because they're different from humans

But the reason it had to be was because there was a lawsuit because apparently they were being discriminated against.

So their ruling basically interepreted the law as encompassing sexual orientation in the group of human-beings.

It might've be covered in the law already, but parties suing didn't think so since they were being discriminated against in jobs or whatever.

What was the case?

I don't know the full details, but obviously some kind of discrimination was alleged

I just mean that laws are often broken, regardless if they're already law.

Yeah, I would like to see the case because I know there was a case where a homo teacher sued a church that wouldn't allow her to work there but the church won

So even though all humans should be under the umbrella of discrimination laws, if a case is brought saying that those laws were broken, then the ruling has to decide on what the intrepretation is

Very true

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/17-1618_hfci.pdf

That was the case that conservatives railed against Roberts for

I hate to say but I agree with Roberts on that one, I understand why the conservatives were so upset about it though. But that's more about moral faith than it is about human rights. I wish I could force them to stop sinning but even God says you have the right to choose

As for the case with the church, I agree with the Church, the state can't tell a religion to go against their own rules. That's separation

So then discrimination protection can't be truly across the board though

Sure it can. Why not?

Because of the religious exemption

Can't be across the board if there's exemtion

That's not fair though, you can't force a religion to break their own rules. They're not going to force you to stop being you?

So do you enforce religious protections over or under discrimination protection ?

Over, but that's not discrimination, That's simply religious practice. They have the right to practice that religious faith. Religion is one of the things that you can't discriminate against either.

True, but how do you ensure BOTH protections across the board ?

way to go @DariusGalaxyz, you just advanced to level 8 <:magahat:772838503239122984>

You really can't.

Sure you can, I mean why would a homosexual person want to go work at a church where they know that is a sin? At that point you're really just being a troll. They're a billion other places you can go work at that have nothing to do with the religion and still be able to teach.

Not if you're desperate for a job maybe

But honestly though, it isn't about what is more practical, it's about having the right to do it. That's what laws are about

Now you're just splitting a hair 😅

By the way, switching gears, I'm learning that Alito's decision to move the deadline for the defendant's response in the PA lawsuit from Wednesday afternoon to Tuesday morning, is actually very significant.

Hi

Good morning everyone!

Can elaborate on the significance of it?

@U WISH Hi

Yeah can you keep elaborating? @DariusGalaxyz

Because the "seating" of the electors happens on 12/8/2020 @ Noon.

Yes plz

That's what the safe-harbor deadline was about