Message from @AnarchyDevin

Discord ID: 588430942243389440


2019-06-12 18:09:59 UTC  

John is better at both.

2019-06-12 18:10:25 UTC  

As male scarcity occurs it's best to use women for jobs so as not to waste men

2019-06-12 18:10:30 UTC  

I get it now

2019-06-12 18:10:42 UTC  

however, if John just focuses on fishing and Stacy just focuses on gathering coconuts, and then they trade, they both get more in total than what they could do by themselves.

2019-06-12 18:11:07 UTC  

Oh and they can have kids

2019-06-12 18:11:16 UTC  

Yeah. Would be better if John reproduced via mitosis and did everything himself lol

2019-06-12 18:11:23 UTC  

Except it wouldn't.

2019-06-12 18:11:24 UTC  

Hehe true

2019-06-12 18:11:33 UTC  

because John would then be doubly burdened.

2019-06-12 18:11:45 UTC  

And not perform as well

2019-06-12 18:11:52 UTC  

opportunity cost is a real economic principle

2019-06-12 18:12:00 UTC  

Indeed

2019-06-12 18:12:19 UTC  

@Xychotic did the Austrians write on that stuff?

2019-06-12 18:12:21 UTC  

It could have just as easily been Bill and Jack.

2019-06-12 18:12:31 UTC  

I vaguely recall that

2019-06-12 18:12:56 UTC  

Also apparently the percentage of females born per male is higher?

2019-06-12 18:13:05 UTC  

But, to illustrate the point in m-f dynamic, I used the m-f examples.

2019-06-12 18:13:14 UTC  

I think it's the other way.

2019-06-12 18:13:20 UTC  

Like 51% to 49%

2019-06-12 18:13:37 UTC  

Maybe in China....

2019-06-12 18:14:29 UTC  

But I swear that there are more women than men where I live

2019-06-12 18:14:41 UTC  

there are in the US

2019-06-12 18:14:48 UTC  

Ah

2019-06-12 18:17:45 UTC  

Guys also tend to die earlier

2019-06-12 18:17:56 UTC  

Also as i was reading through my school textbook for government class there was a section devoted to discussing the feminization of poverty and heavily implied the laws weren't just enough for women

In 2016

2019-06-12 18:18:10 UTC  

Whether by suck starting a shotgun or by any other sequence of dubious decisions.

2019-06-12 18:18:48 UTC  

Heart attacks too

2019-06-12 18:19:06 UTC  

The irony there is that there are piles of men eager to become Captain Save-A-Hoe.

2019-06-12 18:19:22 UTC  

But the laws drive them away.

2019-06-12 18:19:55 UTC  

Also are those women really living a lifestyle of poverty, or is it just their welfare status?

2019-06-12 18:20:34 UTC  

they just want provision

2019-06-12 18:20:38 UTC  

the data does not include monetization of benefits

2019-06-12 18:21:02 UTC  

Remember, women spend 3x what men spend.

2019-06-12 18:21:15 UTC  

That money is either debt, or earned by a man

2019-06-12 18:21:50 UTC  

that's actually confimred?

2019-06-12 18:22:00 UTC  

@Xychotic which does not necessarily mean that the feminization of poverty is true in the sense of the actual life they live

2019-06-12 18:22:12 UTC  

That's what I'm saying.

2019-06-12 18:22:21 UTC  

Imagine this

2019-06-12 18:22:43 UTC  

She earns 15k a year. She's below the poverty line.

2019-06-12 18:23:01 UTC  

Women are 80% of the consumer market, and before people go like "well women have always done the shopping in the family" I look at them and ask "lmao there are no families in 2019"

2019-06-12 18:23:26 UTC  

What is not reported is the equivalent of 12k in section 8 housing benefits. 5k in food stamps