Message from @AnarchyDevin
Discord ID: 588430656317685772
@Xychotic what do you mean?
The classic example is a John and Stacy on a desert island. They can gather coconuts or fish.
John is better at both.
As male scarcity occurs it's best to use women for jobs so as not to waste men
I get it now
however, if John just focuses on fishing and Stacy just focuses on gathering coconuts, and then they trade, they both get more in total than what they could do by themselves.
Oh and they can have kids
Yeah. Would be better if John reproduced via mitosis and did everything himself lol
Except it wouldn't.
Hehe true
because John would then be doubly burdened.
And not perform as well
opportunity cost is a real economic principle
Indeed
@Xychotic did the Austrians write on that stuff?
It could have just as easily been Bill and Jack.
I vaguely recall that
Also apparently the percentage of females born per male is higher?
But, to illustrate the point in m-f dynamic, I used the m-f examples.
I think it's the other way.
Maybe in China....
But I swear that there are more women than men where I live
there are in the US
Ah
Guys also tend to die earlier
Also as i was reading through my school textbook for government class there was a section devoted to discussing the feminization of poverty and heavily implied the laws weren't just enough for women
In 2016
Whether by suck starting a shotgun or by any other sequence of dubious decisions.
Heart attacks too
The irony there is that there are piles of men eager to become Captain Save-A-Hoe.
But the laws drive them away.
Also are those women really living a lifestyle of poverty, or is it just their welfare status?
they just want provision
the data does not include monetization of benefits
Remember, women spend 3x what men spend.
That money is either debt, or earned by a man
that's actually confimred?
@Xychotic which does not necessarily mean that the feminization of poverty is true in the sense of the actual life they live
That's what I'm saying.
Imagine this
She earns 15k a year. She's below the poverty line.