Even if they are anticlimactic.
Though, I agree, in cinema, it's often a good idea to make it more dramatically satisfying.
Why is cinema the exception?
Because its a visual medium
Yeah, pretty much.
The visual medium only has a few instants to make an impression.
Because you're imaging the fight in your head books/novels have endless play so long as its consistent
So, even an "unsatisfying" ending can be given a great deal of flavor that would take pages in a book.
I see
But, a slipshod ending can irrevocably ruin a scene/storyline.
Just look at Star Wars and Rey.
Oh god
I mean, look how many people think that SW is ruined because of that?
I wish Rey would have fucking died. Such a shit character
Really, it isn't. Just disregard the sequels.
We need that meme with Disney and the infinity gauntlet
You can still love the originals and dismiss the sequels as the reskinned feminist propaganda pieces they are.
It's what i did
I just pretend that it's Lukes fever dream
I don't even give it that much credit.
It's like the Christmas special.
A cash grubbing fan fiction.
Like Islam and Mormonism.
LOL
<:lolz:480186121897377792>
That punchline broke Muhamad and Joseph Smith's bones
lol
But, then again, my understanding is that GoT overrun the content.
They should have stuck to the books instead of trying to do their own thing.
Fuckin' A
I got aggressively bored of it when I realized the Game of Thrones had become The War of Feminists.
Those Kweens were fucking horrible
Between Cersei, Daenarys, and the angry Stark Daughters, I was just bored of it in principle.
Both from a writing standpoint and in the context of the story
I would rather live under Tywin Lannisters rule
Oh, and choppy boy's sister.
it would suck but he knew his shit
Yara?
Sure.
dont forget her uncle. Euron ''A finger in the bum'' Greyjoy
