Though i haven't been keeping up to date on my genetic research lately.

Humans share half our DNA with bananas

What's wrong with the information they give?

you don't like the name?

Well, cause we just proved it wrong within the first couple sentences.

you really think humans share 50% dna with bananas?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://sciencing.com/animals-share-human-dna-sequences-8628167.html&ved=2ahUKEwjd8-qOkd_qAhWNCTQIHbo9BQkQFjABegQIDBAH&usg=AOvVaw1A348qii4Eb52dJbkUtKTz&cshid=1595362252739

I know so

Yeah. I've seen the dna sequences matched up.. maybe not with a banana specifically, but with other animals and such.

well this particular sequence doesn't match up

apes and humans

im also talking about DNA

just saying, I can believe evolution isn't real and you can believe it is.

you're using all this info based on evolution being real, even though it's shown that humans and apes don't have the same DNA

"Well, rather surprisingly, genes – the regions of DNA that code for proteins – only make up about 2% of your DNA. So sharing 50% of our genes with bananas means we only actually share 1% of our DNA with them – not 50."

Oh, evolution is absolutely real, we've seen it happen before our eyes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth_evolution

what some people are usually against is MACRO evolution

scientists lie about global warming, why wouldn't they lie about humans evolving from apes?

I'm talking about humans evolving from apes, I haven't looked into moths.

That's an example of microevolution

i was taught in public school that we evolved from tadpoles to land fish onto apes to humans. if we eat fish does that make us some type of cannibal?

anyway, i think being skeptical is good. I for one find the evidence damning. Our genetic markers are not the same at all and I just don't believe we evolved from fish to land fish and then into furry mammals somehow

Evolution takes time. Millions and millions of years

I just read a BBC article on how humans are related to fish and all they had was how embryos sort of looking fish-like as their evidence

Okay yeah, that is a bit of a stretch

But there is evidence for evolution all over the place

maybe

"fishy features" they call it

and hiccups make us fish related

and somehow shark gonads and human gonads somehow make us similar to fish

shark gonads don't descend and human gonads do descend so.... evidence

shark isn't a fish...it's a mammal still swimming

a shark is a fish

Lmfao

They say the philtrum has no use whaaat!? It's used to help babies breathe when they're breast feeding.

:\

Humans didn't evolve from monkeys or apes, we both just split off from a common ancestor <:dogekek:726878872607653918> That's why apes are apes and humans are humans today.
> I'm talking about humans evolving from apes, I haven't looked into moths.
@Meryl.140.15

wasn't what I was taught in school and i still don't think we evolved

are they changing the evolution curriculum too?

Yeah, that "humans come from apes" thing is a misconception. I also never really learned about evolution in science classes in my life; only about biology with plants and some animals