Message from @Tsar Vladimir Putin
Discord ID: 733625988902158336
still somehting like grippen i think woudl have been good. something that can stay up for long. and carry a good amount of weapons. and can land on highways. as out airports surely are the first to go..
nahh i agree.. still we tryed.
I think ww3 will be with mainly missiles
Whoever has better missiles has an advantage
or more..
Like chyna?
but as it is. russian planes collide with swedish plane some years ago.. so we sertainly dont need stealth.. haha
btu i might be tlaking out of my ass.. btu i dont think the F35 is good value for money in our case.. its more of a first strike thing.
we just need some that can repel them form our territory.
F 15?
and if stealh.. they might just think theres isent enyone. and go too far.. and light the match..
yeah woudl also have been nice.
You do realise they wont send planes to nuke a place right?
If that happens ifc
*ofc
We should take this to the <#722914562160197663> @𝕱𝖗𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖚𝖑𝖋
maybe or maybe not. still dosent change that we have to repel them ofthen..
ok
Why
should be marx i think. and not stalin. or ?
#memeoftheweek
I mean he did technically hit the sign lol...
but no bullseye
are they free or in protective custody ....and those that are 'free' are really on lo-jack status
@WhiteMoogle now that i've had time to settle and think about it... most custody cases are settled via JOINT custody. The men who fight have a 40% chance of winning sole custody whereas women have 60% chance and the numbers are only increasing for men because men are choosing to fight more. I'm guaranteeing that you're withholding vital information. I do it, too. When I don't want people to know things... I don't tell them. Not saying there aren't insane judges out there, I just find it hard to believe you didn't know she was a drug addict if she used drugs that often which means you didn't make very good decisions yourself and I wouldn't be surprised if you yourself partook in those activities. I mean, drug addicts don't make very good parents. I speak from experience. Just saying.
the article i read on it said mens rights in family courts have been increasing the past the 20 years. the best way to remove the states with bad family court laws would be to remove the bad lawmakers
technically the bad lawmakers are the courts assuming that they're the lawmakers when in constitutional law...they're not the law makers(their behavior is known as 'admiralty' law)
you know, a lot of people never really pay attention to what their state and local officials sign into law.
I know I certainly didn't but i didn't pay attention to politics at all until Trump won