turns out it had a stronger checks and balances system in play

Good to know

I'll guess we will have to wait and see

alot of the early 13 states had their own constitution per state of running things...from out of those original 13 state constitutions, did the original us constitution get created

The original framework was very close to complete anarchy

every other state in the union was basically a copy of one or more of the original 13 state constitutions

I didn't know they kept the same state constitutions at the time. I know the federal government was overhauled once or twice before we had the system we do today

well nobody wanted to give elected nor appointed ppl any power beyond what is needed after what they experienced in the past

Not completely true, at one point G. W. was on track to be crowed King

"power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely"

But the decision was no monarchs, as most experiences with them had soured everyone on the idea

ya...well eventually they had that clause in the constitution to not allow any citizen to hold office if they had royal standing

Which would be confusing today since we as a nation don't have a royal class. Celebrity status being the closest I think

most modern day monarchs and royalties are basically nothing more than puppet leaders considering the level of constitutional restrictions put upon them....they're just the ones that have to sign the paperwork when the elected/appointed officials bring it to them

shit is changing to where they can have a voice on the shit they get stuck signing so they don't have to be total puppets of the state

The industrial countries at any rate

Spain i think is still an actual monarchy

most 'royal class' we have in the usa is rich ppl in general, celebs and lifetime elected/appointed officials

The lifetime elected officials need to go i feel

and they're pretty much finding out the hard way that when they abuse their 'royal status', they get dethroned

With the exception of the Supreme court

well the sc is a tenor of constitutional justice

It makes sense to have lifetime appointment to help stave off corruption

one must prove to be of worth of the constitutional devotion to even sit on the sc

many in the past have yet to fill that status but still managed to get a spot on the sc

the sc is supposed to be non partisan but has been for many many decades to be partisan

True, but seems to be mostly still functional

all of trump's appointees ....non partisan

Don't tell a lefty that

They will accuse you of being a socialist

which is why both the criminal dems and rinos hated them...non partisan judges loyal to the constitution is the last thing they need on the sc...

note, i'm talking constitutional law criminals..not admiralty law criminals

admiralty law criminals could be allies of the constitution and vice versa

Still would having leftist screaming national socialist at the top of their lungs, not that they have a clue thats what they are screaming

it already did

Sorry dude

when they scream "we're losing our democracy" ...is when they soon realize they never had one to begin with...the democracy was an illusion of admiralty law oppression

those that scream for it to be returned know they're guilty of treason against the constitutional common laws

You've lost me with that one. Mostly because I don't completely know what admiralty law is

I would say this is way past due and time anyone who doesn't/didn't learn it anyway.

I just hope the checks and balances work as intended