Message from @Bladejewel
Discord ID: 776500263472594955
Why y'all putting 'X's' on my post?
> Why y'all putting 'X's' on my post?
@Chemyst I think it's more x for the subject not for you
just a thought... if ~200k votes are flipped from Biden to Trump, it would give him the popular vote. Colorado passed a law recently that their electors would be required to vote for the popular vote candidate. That would give Trump Colorado as well... talk about liberal tears!!!
Here's a theory that might make everyone happy. If Grassley takes the presidency he would uphold the constitution and if he's able to say nice things before left wing media brainwashed liberals to hate him, we might get some unity
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/07/fact-check-pelosi-would-not-become-president-if-election-were-delayed/5550459002/
I feel like there should be a standard for emoticons... I thought X was for fake news.
PRESIDENT PELOSI <:KEK:726877368601411624>
I agree though for fake news I put
@Kawboy That doesn't take effect until enough states to reach 270 electoral votes join the pact.
That would be funny though
Texas secretary of state says there's no evidence of widespread cowboys
Arizona secretary of state says there's no evidence of widespread desert
Idaho secretary of state says there's no evidence of widespread potatoes
Alaska secretary of state says there's no evidence of widespread not many people wanting to live there because it's cold af
Tennessee secretary of state says there's no evidence of widespread country music
SSDD
> https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1326926226888544256
@matthew’s’hoes how can trumo prove this in court, that's the question
with evidence
> with evidence
@chaz nice lol
not saying he can, just saying the hypothetical
> with evidence
@chaz is that.
With evidence ?
Or
That is with evidence !
that is "he can only win through evidence that holds up in court"
yes, of course its wd evidence...but in courts, especially fraud cases, it has to be direct and wd substance
that is based on the election data
article above goes into it
article by gateway pundit
also in <#760648730431979560>
> how can trumo prove this in court, that's the question
@kapitanJ Oh. . . oh no. . . did President Trump merge with Governor Cuomo, making a Trumo? America is screwed now 😦
@mathgrant haha too lazy to correct
Yes he has a fuck ton of evidence. He has affidavits and all this shit of things getting tampered and switched and thrown out.
> Tennessee secretary of state says there's no evidence of widespread country music
@mathgrant Do Wisconsin because that's where I'm at.
> @mathgrant Do Wisconsin because that's where I'm at.
@Slavinchy? Wisconsin secretary of state says there's no evidence of widespread cheese
That was incredibly easy.
It's still funny.
Lollll
Oklahoma secretary of state says there's no evidence of widespread Broadway musicals
Wasn't it like universally known in politics that you should never speak in absolutes just to cover your ass? Literally every company does stuff like that too because they know even if a .001% chance of them being wrong is technically proof of them being wrong. That is why cooperate talk is not "We always make the best service for all of our customers" and more of a "We here at company strive to create the best possible service..." Just in case.
I just feel like that was all forgotten over the last month.
lawyer-speak
That is a better way to put it
> Oklahoma secretary of state says there's no evidence of widespread Broadway musicals
@mathgrant the Netherlands DHS says there is no enidence of widespread tulips
UK Home office says there's no evidence of widespread tea drinking
Illinois secretary of state says there's no widespread evidence of gang violence.