Message from @nate_

Discord ID: 778196560818339880


2020-11-17 06:25:34 UTC  

idk how true it is

2020-11-17 06:25:39 UTC  
2020-11-17 06:26:10 UTC  

Biden denied a lot, you believe him too?

2020-11-17 07:43:52 UTC  

Mind if I ask

2020-11-17 07:43:58 UTC  

How is the map looking?

2020-11-17 07:44:11 UTC  

The same.

2020-11-17 07:44:42 UTC  

So biden won?

2020-11-17 07:44:57 UTC  

Nope, he's not President elect.

2020-11-17 07:45:08 UTC  

We still have a lot more days to go. 🙂

2020-11-17 08:27:59 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/730962163098976346/778174584700534814/image0.png

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/730962163098976346/778174585022971912/image1.png

2020-11-17 08:54:26 UTC  

Virginia?

2020-11-17 09:52:58 UTC  

This needa be heard ^^

2020-11-17 09:53:27 UTC  

Share it and it will be 😉

2020-11-17 09:54:08 UTC  

Wait the comments are talking about it being about a test batch and not hacking it

2020-11-17 09:54:25 UTC  

I mean that’s incredible if that’s real but I want to make sure

2020-11-17 09:54:42 UTC  

It’s just explaining how it works

2020-11-17 09:55:03 UTC  

k thanks

2020-11-17 09:55:18 UTC  

I don’t wanna get as bad as a lib making baseless points

2020-11-17 09:55:23 UTC  

That’s from the manual 😉

2020-11-17 10:03:06 UTC  

I don't see the manual saying "Feed it with Biden-marked test stacks". It could as well have been Trump stacks, it only depends on the user's will. Only the commenter here assumes that it has been used pro-Biden. Not to say it hasn't been done, just saying it's far from being proof, and doesn't warrant 3 rotating-lights.

2020-11-17 10:16:29 UTC  

> I don't see the manual saying "Feed it with Biden-marked test stacks". It could as well have been Trump stacks, it only depends on the user's will. Only the commenter here assumes that it has been used pro-Biden. Not to say it hasn't been done, just saying it's far from being proof, and doesn't warrant 3 rotating-lights.
@Alexis Fontana yeah I’m still skeptical too

2020-11-17 10:16:40 UTC  

I feel like there’s fraud on both sides

2020-11-17 10:18:24 UTC  

There is at least an over-expectation to find fraud on our side at least. I'm all for it, but I really hope Saint Guliani and Saint Sidney actually have something in the pipe 😉

2020-11-17 10:19:28 UTC  

While I think there’s fraud on both sides the msm is really trying to push all fraud claims on trump when it seems most of it is on biden

2020-11-17 13:49:11 UTC  

> I don't see the manual saying "Feed it with Biden-marked test stacks". It could as well have been Trump stacks, it only depends on the user's will. Only the commenter here assumes that it has been used pro-Biden. Not to say it hasn't been done, just saying it's far from being proof, and doesn't warrant 3 rotating-lights.
@Alexis Fontana so 2 rotating lights then?

2020-11-17 14:11:27 UTC  

someone isn't paying attention... lol

2020-11-17 15:22:15 UTC  

Just keeping in mind that fraud happens on both sides

2020-11-17 15:23:00 UTC  

Biden camp may did it more than us, but it is still a possibility that some trump voters also committed fraud

2020-11-17 15:25:19 UTC  

For sure.

2020-11-17 15:25:30 UTC  

@isoboto Statistics and common sense says that was not the problem.

2020-11-17 15:26:33 UTC  

^^^ for sure. but both sides can play the game

2020-11-17 15:26:34 UTC  

But that is like a couple hundred/thousand rather then 3 fucking million is kinda retarded

2020-11-17 15:27:00 UTC  

just because the evidence is pointing suspiciously on one side only doesn't mean the other is completely innoncent

2020-11-17 15:27:48 UTC  

people doing wrong can only go so far (which is still wrong and a crime) vs a entire organization(s) that have control over the counts/ballots.

2020-11-17 15:30:31 UTC  

@isoboto that is pretty ambiguous, yeap lets assume both sides comminted voter fraud, problem is the ratio was like 500:1 in democraps favor...