Since I don’t really pay attention
Trump's SCOTUS lawsuits are in 4 states. <:AmericanFlag:720120797837918288>
She has won exactly zero cases and continues to beg for money
They are drawing out the clock. If there is still litigation in these states come JAN 6, the 12th amemndment comes into play.
Michigan is doing something smh.
Maybe
Technically Trump hasn’t won any cases either
the problem with the texas suit is it was too early in the 'movie'
not enough evidence out on the stage
If we win Michigan and Wisconsin... PA could be won by SCOTUS?
We just need one case to bring the evidence out on
Remember, SCOWI hearing is tomorrow. (Probably)
WI and MI might be won without a lawsuit
well the pa case is valid, but currently internal at the moment, it could be brought before the scotus
How is the Wisconsin SC republican wise?
I think she has got the evidence that would win over a court if it were ever allowed into court, but I think the point for now is just to ensure Trump gets a valid shot in HoD.
@metallica846 I think WI SC is pretty republican.
Justices there are elected instead of appointed.
@metallica846 WI SC is very GOP friendly
The case is about suspicious ballots found in the WI recount
most justices are elected instead of appointed upon merit in most states
MI is sus for the AG blocking the publication of DOMINION results.
dem/gop friendly isn't the issue, it's constitutionally law abiding is what we should all be concerned with
Oh
Some of these legislatures needs to do something.
Ugh it doesn’t sound good reading about it.
Just means there was something there that the AG doesn't want people to know about.
Wisconsin case isn’t even about fraud.
I wonder if there is a way to get the results
Illegal ways probably...
Of the MI dominion results I mean
@Rocci I mean legal ways
I think there was someone who said they know what the results were.
Since it seems like withholding evidence should be illegal
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.freep.com/amp/3876804001
👀
Hmmmmmm
A disinformation campaign they say
how?
He says that after failing to appear at a hearing and then lawyering up. . .
@Marcel l'éléphant I meant without the SC
