Message from @[TDE] Smokie
Discord ID: 724375228620341330
And thats hard
Not to mention the fact that chinese and us carriers will be the 1st ones at the bottom of the pacific if this shit happens
Because they will go for carriers first
Yup
And there's nothing that can stop the amount of rockets and misses shot at em
Basically if you underestimate your enemy you lose
Its MAD
Overestimate your enemy and you win
Know thyself you will half your battles, know your yourself and your enemy you will be undefeated
Yes
overestimating is just as bad as underestimating
Well no
Bring 100 tanks to destroy 1
Who wins?
While the enemy bums you elsewhere😝 where those 100 tanks could of been better used
Depends
100 Sherman's vs 1 abram
Abram will win
No tank has 100 shells
Do they?
So...
We would be stupid to try and annex china if we ever did go to war with them
Abrams will have to run
a land war would be a no go
Theres no point
MAD
MAD
Exactly why we haven't wared with Russia, China etc...
Btw check out the aviation thread
I made a new b 52 variant
yep. It would basically be a war of flexing power tbh. they wouldnt be crazy enough to invade us, and vice versa
Yeah
its only the cities that need to be dealt with along their coast
But russia brings up a good point. Even if we take the cities, we still have a massive insurgency to deal with. Plus we have a distinct disadvantage there, as we have no supply lines. And if we did, they would be to coastal cities, so most in-country cities are off the table
we simply wouldnt be able to reinforce them
Germany tried
They failed
France tried
They failed
and they had the benefit of surprise.