the Iowa would most likely be used for artillery support for civilian Militias in the Los Angeles area

how long that lasts depends to the fighting and how long it takes for the military to get there

Ah now I see

Well antifa wouldn't last long against a battleship, let alone a militia

best part is, if you're shelling from however far out at sea, no worries of idiots getting aboard

What are they gonna do, drop lizzo on the ship?

<:KEK:726877368601411624>

how they gonna do that tho, she'll sink any small craft and weighs so much no aircraft can take off

Only real problem would be ppl like Mattis and his goons

Don't understand why a general would not want to put his nation first

I thought mattis was with us

or is he one of those rinos

I think the latter

Any generals who support DT?

Game recognizes game.

not that im aware of

Maybe they keep their opinions to themselves.

I guess

smart move to be honest

someone tried scaring me into doing stuff by quoting The Art of War at me

Everyone: canada buy hornets

Rambo:

Everyone: Yeah the Canadian buying hornets was a very good choice

TacLar: honestly Hornet was a good choice for Canada for the time, especially if only havign the budget to makethe compromise for having a single combat aircraft type. The contract for acquisition was signed in 1980). SO by 1983 Canada started receiving amodern, brand new plane that replaced multiple aircraft ( F104, F5, F101) to fulfill all their roles. Although F16 first, may have ushered in the era of fly by wire, the Hornet for its time was a state of the art strike fighter, that in turn brought upon an era of the digital interface " IE glass cockpits", all whilst being streamlined enough to be much easier on logistics and maintenance than the Cat as well as a lesser purchase cost per airframe. At the same time the Hornet for its time was arguably more capable in a2a in avionics and weapons the Viper which at the time had considerably inferior APG66 radar, and no bvr missile capability. So between the even more cheap F16 and single role Tomcat or F15. the Hornet was a happy middle ground. The Tomcat wasn't purchased because it was more expensive. It was also less flexible and with hindsight would have proven to be a hangar queen. I mean you think Cf18's are past their intended airframe hours and barely holding together now? Relative to legacy Hornets imagine trying to maintain F-14's into present day.

I heard about it but I never watched it. It looked super cool.

Ye

whats yalls favorite war?

Junkers Ju 390

That's one chonky boi

how much does she weight?

Empty - 37 tons

wow

is this one of those "flying tanks" and i dont mean like the antonov a20

Its an bomber

And passenger plane

i mean is it "built like a tank"

No it basically hasn’t got any armor

It could carry 22 tonnes of bombs tho

dayum

Ooh

https://youtu.be/dkiKsnWm0JA

no war is a good war and no war should be a favorite. But if I had to choose i'd say the invasion of afghanistan because we killed the extremists right after 9/11

i like ww1

i mean favorite to read into, watch movies etc