Message from @mightytrump
Discord ID: 794857451601002527
Where exactly is that quote from?
just this article i found
Ah
it's just someone's view, completely opinionated
i mean the interpretation might be spot on but the article is opinion
Regardless, the article is a good strength test of your beliefs
yeah it's making me think
You know what makes me think?
what's that
How the bible goes "Mount Sinai in Arabia"
?
The way I see it, there are two interpretations
One is Mount Sinai is indeed in Arabia
Two is that the word Hagar refers to Mount Sinai, for Arabians
i'm not following
Does the Bible say Mount Sinai is in Arabia or no?
Idk does it?
Probably the first one
I saw some footage of quite possibly the place
I saw some pics yeah of that
Then the nearby cave fit it's description pretty well too
They found noahs ark resting place and they found the remains of sodom and gomorrah
So they say anyway
Isn't the resting place on Mount Ararat?
Like apparently sodom and gomorrah was literally under ash from sort of firey disaster
I forget the name it sounds kinda familiar
Good
lol
There are a lot of desert ruins to sift through still
Good that i forgot the name or good that those cities had evidence of firey disasters lol
Another sleepless night
it's good that sodom and gomorrah got destroyed
Ah they were cities full of like debauchery werent they
Sexual immorality iirc
Satanism is not a religion
Change my mind
I have a question for some Christians in this server
I’m being confirmed as a Catholic in spring, and I’m currently working through this big book. I was told a month ago by someone on this server that Christians don’t see a need for a Pope. According to this book, Jesus appointed Peter as the leader of the church, the Catholic Church. I also read about some edits Catholics made to the Bible to fit their beliefs, is this one of the changes because if Jesus *really* appointed a pope, I don’t see a reason there shouldn’t be one. If Jesus did appoint a church leader, why shouldn’t there be one now?
The Bible only gives two church leaders, the pastor (also called bishop or elder) or the deacon. A priest is not in context of a New Testament church, and monk, nun, cardinal, pope, etc. all do not occur in the Bible. If it is not in the Bible, it ought not be accepted for the church because the Bible is the sole authority for faith and practice in church. Thus, the pope is an unbiblical position. Regarding that specifically, there was no pope position until about the year 606. For the church in Rome, up until that point there were only bishops over it. The year 606, Emperor Phocas, the emperor of the Roman Empire, bestowed upon the Roman Bishop Boniface III the title of Papa, meaning the Pope, or supreme father, as in over all churches. It had not existed before then. In fact, the previous head of the Rome church, Gregory III (d. 604), had resisted that being made of him, and said, “If a bishop, whoever he be, is called a general bishop (that is, pope), the whole church decays.” He also said, “I candidly say that any one who calls himself a general bishop, or desires to be called such, is, in his exaltation, the forerunner of antichrist.” His words were prophetic! The pope has been called the antichrist by many, many groups through the centuries.
That’s very interesting, and makes me want to change my religion more