it was a terrible hearing

They bet on the wrong horse

Where is that? I can't read

and that shit happens in California alllll the time

it happens to almost every man i know. lol

well not all of them

but some men meet some bitches

and then they divorce and get all this money

and keep men in the system to milk that child support.

Just be like Keanu

Hoover them

they consent to sex, then they didn't get what they hoped for out of it, then claimed rape

sorry, not every guy u have sex with on the planet is a porn stud

Even worse, they claim rape and then the video tapes come out and they're like... "oh maybe i instigated it... a littttle bit"

and then they're set fre

free

and guy's life is still fucked

accusations alone put ppl on sex offender lists...imho, it should be only after they're proven guilty..not before

well that's what the change in California is

It also allows pedos some freedom

Well it still doesn't change statutory laws, but I get what you mean. That's where it gets odd...

Too odd

Two strikes Galvin, two strikes

I'm glad the motions to recall him are strong

he'll most likely be gone by March

unless his bitch ass aunt gets away with fraud

well transitions from admiralty laws to constitutional laws take time..they sit on waiting list as statutes(active but not yet constitutional) laws for up to 10yrs til approved or denied ...once denied by the population, they are stripped from the legal system

the problem is we don't know when this started, it coulda started 10yrs ago, or 1 month ago

What are you referring to?

most of the anti pedo laws on the books for most if not all states in the usa is admiralty laws, only when sex trafficking over state lines and some other aspects does it become federal and therefore constitutional law system

I dunno about being a governor but I find it easier to write a law stating "people accused of a sex offense are not to be registered if found innocent"

instead of literally "you can now molest children with lower penalties"

I think the issue is that once it's on your record that shit prances around the internet faster than sonicboom.

Not saying I disagree with you tho. I'm just really trying to understand the reasoning without going on a rampage.

I get the law if it was the case like a 17 year old dating a 16 year old and now he has to notify every neighbor when he moves

But 10 years is just opening gates

pedogates

the movie

Im too lazy to read. @Rui Do you want people to be registered even if they are found innocent?

@itsa.dee No, I said it would be much easier to pass a law (it's stupid that it's even required) saying those found innocent are scrubbed clean. I just disagree with the 10 year gap allowing pedos to have their way. A 20 year old can now seduce a 10 year old child into "consent" (in their mind at least) and get away with it. I can see it being useful for situations where a 17 year old is dating a 16 year old and he's now a registered sex offender, but I disagree with a gap that big.

@itsa.dee I'd have to be a liberal to believe guilty until innocent instead of the other way around.