@Pal3Rid3r don’t post things out of context

It’s your duty to investigate before posting

What are you speaking of?

@Kaladin

The video you posted half an hour ago and 2 messages up from the one I pinged you in

@Pal3Rid3r

Out of context? Epstein was a pedo. I’m not following you @Kaladin Please explain what’s wrong

The video says that John McCain knew about it. And the clip is about three seconds long and has no context and explains nothing. I’m saying that’s a huge accusation and you need to have proof to back it up not some clip that doesn’t explain anything. @Pal3Rid3r 

For crying out loud, John McCain’s not even speaking it’s a woman

It’s his wife Cindy

Does that help?

Not really. Basically what I’m saying is that you can’t show a three second clip and no evidence. Again, accusing someone of being a pedophile or even just knowing about it and not saying anything is a really big accusation. It may or may not be true, but if it is we need more than just a three second clip to prove that. And just so you know, I think I may have come off a little strong earlier, I’m not mad I just think that some accusations warrant hard evidence to back it up, pedophilia being one of them

@Pal3Rid3r

All it says is McCain knew about Epstein island. 🤷🏽‍♂️

It’s not accusing anyone of anything

Implication and accusation are different

I don't like it though. She could literally be talking about anything to be honest

The truth will be a jagged pill for most to swallow

I'm not saying that McCain had nothing to do with Epstein, but that is by no means any proof.

The full context of the video probably will change what is understood about that video right now.

Your not getting it......

Little hollow is correct, context can change meaning

If someone came at you how would you explain this to them? If you can’t have a two minute conversation to back up his accusation, you did it wrong. I already took the jagged red pill man. That’s why I’m here

how are the clintons doing with less children to abuse (since the uncovering of this has probably made it more difficult to abuse children at this time)

https://twitter.com/youthUNDG/status/1328666181952278529

https://twitter.com/UAgainstHT/status/1328521852290019331

https://twitter.com/UAgainstHT/status/1328522356537626624

https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/nearly-90000-sexual-abuse-claims-against-boy-scouts-filed-organizations-bankrupcy-case

90k cases

Sad times for the Boy Scouts.

They caved to political correctness about allowing or disallowing adult leaders based on sexual preference after winning the court case that determined they were not legally required to do so.

This current eventuality was the main reason stated for their original stance.

We'll see what happens. 🤦

Only a small number of Scouts become Eagles (myself among them). I wonder if that number will dwindle to nothingness.

https://twitter.com/ICEgov/status/1329047458287149056

I think its like 3 percent

I thought it was 1%

So according to the wikipedia only 4% have made eagle since 1922, however scouting.org says 8% earned it in 2019.

Sorry, 1911 not 1922

That makes me think the eagle rank has been devalued, much like SAT scores over the years.

At least I can use it for something if I enlist in the National Guard.

I seem to remember reading about a scout troop in Ohio ran by a couple women that started admitting girls and then barred boys from joining. So confusing.

I’m glad I got out before all this went down.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/florida-child-sex-trafficking-network-bust