Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 759098770846777345
I think u mean coca (cocoa is chocolate).
they did that on purpose in the newer books so ppl wouldn't discover on their own cocoa/chocolate farms
same plant..just different age cycles of the plant ...the 'bean' plant is few yrs old, looks like a tree
the 'sprouts' of the seedlings ...are what the cocaine comes from
it has almost no trace of any cocaine in it's tree lifecycle for producing seed gords
mostly why cocoa early farmers are basically on lockdown til their crops grow old enough to start producing seeds(i found a farmer that told me the shit about it)
@qwerty_😎 the old herbal books had this 'sauce' on the coca/cocoa confusion ..it used to be just called coca for the young seedlings, while the adult plants that produced the seeds were called cocoa according to the early south american farmers
some botanany books post 1950's got them confused and called them 2 different plants
any herbal books predate 1950's will have truth about it
1950's was when big pharma started to emerge
U learn something new everyday 😛
list of those that will sell out the nation most likely
if they voted 'YES' to approve the sale of american uranium mining to russian oligarch who owns rosatom who's close personal ally to putin, they already did.
if they're complicit with any crimes against humanity/children ..then yes
BBC confirms the internet is responsible for climate change: scroll to the bottom legal statements The emissions from travel it took to report this story were 0kg CO2. The digital emissions from this story are an estimated 1.2g to 3.6g CO2 per page view. Find out more about how we calculated this figure here. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200923-could-geoengineering-save-the-arctic-sea-ice
actually climate change been around longer than the internet has
conservative estimate if only 1 trillion internet pages are looked at in one day (very conservative inorder to keep realistic probably 3 times under actual) 3.6grams x 1 trillion / by 1,000 to convert grams into kilograms = 3.6 billion kilograms of CO2 just from 1 trillion webpage views
oh i'm just having fun with the leftists
we will have to cancel the internet and their cell phones to save the planet cuz...citydwellers
tell them that using their iphone has a high carbon footprint ...and paying for it makes it even higher
they must cancel their CO2 emissions by turning their apartments into gardens ( we all know they will grow nothing but marijuana for the most part wink wink)
and that the cloud services they use are high n co2
grow weed, make money .....state legalizes weed, everybody stops growing food to grow weed....then all of the sudden weed growing doesn't make money but growing food does
cloud services replicate energy used for every device the information is created on
but that web page viewing/creation statistic the bbc displayed, that would just be for one day estimate
i must email great thrunberg and tell her suicide is the only way to save the planet
or being eaten by ecofriendly predators
i'll just store everything on ssd or usb stick - 6months later the data expires because the storage device needs recharging every so often
save a polar bear greta go wander off into the arctic
i store everything offline on hdds ...they keep forever
Oh Twitter
Maybe she chose her gender...
So now her "society" decided her gender should be "gender-neutral".
Where did we mess up? Oh boy where do we begin?
The gender-neutral patriarchy!argg
Gender neutral. Well that's stupid.