I still have an impossible time understanding the problem with 'gentrification.'

No Trader Joes in certain communities is considered racist
You put one in, it's called racist gentrifier and robbed

yea it’s for profits mostly. Some race might prefer a certain place but profits above all else

It’s like if Nintendo marketed it to girls, they would expect less sales. Not exclusive to boys but it would get more money

Also at Gen 1 it’s really interesting

yes ive been in it

isn’t there a difference between slurs and attacks? Both are bad but one is worse

Kirk is taking on god's works for us by reading these brain-numbing stuff

Thank you Kirk

Give me credit. I’m the one reading it too

Also wow Gen 1 is going wild

froski is owning that debate

yea I’m not sure why they are talking about total freedom

because thats where that HMAB dude took it

People are doing swatika can do it but they will have massive consequences

like there’s technically nothing stopping you from doing what you want but there are laws that will heavily punish you. Not sure if he was implying that

Thank you for being here. Makes the insanity easier.

You're an MVP.

>the requirements for being a mother in today's world are difficult and unprecedented! You mean I have to pay attention to my child???

Wow women in the past didn’t mind, why women today?

Look at how hard life as a mother in the city is!

Jesus Christ

I like how her child socializing is a ""need""

Like she doesnt believe her child should socialize

i'm straying out of that <:KEK:726877368601411624> anyone want popcorn?

Sounds like someone just doesnt want to be a mother.

What is happening in Gen 1?

always, comrade ❤️

Just get a nanny, apparently that’s what minority’s are for

Oh boy its hmab lmao

hmab (the gender dude from before) was arguing that the us constitution is unnecessary because it either doesn't include extensive bans like britain's laws, or it's "racist" and "useless"

I gave up on him the last time. He is... there is no reason to argue with him for his sake.

Thanks for the update.

he's a good intention dude. a brit conservative

We have a country because the Brits were oppressive

Ain't following british rule again.

I'm sure he is mostly fine. But he isnt trying to see other sides. He wants to say his way and misrepresent others so. I turned off from that lmao

he does have that tendencies. but froski is a lawyer, so hopefully the dude will get enlightened on some perspective