Message from @chaz

Discord ID: 796096304848699422


2021-01-05 19:17:02 UTC  

Say there are 1000 black people they have a 50% chance of dying
1000 white 20% chance of dying
1000 asians 15% chance of dying
1000 Latinos 12% chance of dying
You have to figure all this in to the statistics plus population density and social gatherings
This is why the initial death count estimates were so off

2021-01-05 19:17:24 UTC  

the morality rate is the percent of cases that end in death, we agreed the number aren't exact but also agree that the cases that go unnotice are probably proptional to the deaths that go uncounted, thus, we can make a percentage calulation with the numbers given because percentage are always propotional.

2021-01-05 19:17:52 UTC  

that's a whole lotta guessing

2021-01-05 19:17:58 UTC  

@PRIVILEGED N.P.C. ok, but a moratlity rate is an avegae over lines of race and age

2021-01-05 19:18:09 UTC  

taking an unknown and then assuming it's accurate

2021-01-05 19:18:31 UTC  

Your statistics are way off no reason to try sorry

2021-01-05 19:18:40 UTC  

@Meryl.140.15 no, there's no guessing, the calculation in based on the epidimioloical method

2021-01-05 19:19:04 UTC  

so what are you doing with the uncounted cases then if you're not guessing

2021-01-05 19:19:09 UTC  

That doesnt work in this scenario @chaz

2021-01-05 19:19:20 UTC  

also if we just make the calculation of the number's given it would techincally been the same as a study with a couple hunderd million people

2021-01-05 19:19:38 UTC  

@PRIVILEGED N.P.C. it kinda does work though

2021-01-05 19:19:40 UTC  

Why were the experts so far off from the start?

2021-01-05 19:20:02 UTC  

Kinda doesnt equal does

2021-01-05 19:20:21 UTC  

cause they were predicting the future, I am reading the past

2021-01-05 19:20:25 UTC  

big difference

2021-01-05 19:20:45 UTC  

You're predicting future events off past data

2021-01-05 19:21:09 UTC  

Same as them

2021-01-05 19:21:35 UTC  

no, im saying a given number based on past data

2021-01-05 19:21:49 UTC  

but the past data is inaccurate

2021-01-05 19:22:15 UTC  

I love to argue but if anyone that understands our conversation wants to interject be my guess

2021-01-05 19:22:29 UTC  

yes, but only to a point, as that is basically the equivilent of a very large study case

2021-01-05 19:22:36 UTC  

no, im saying a given number based on past data lol

2021-01-05 19:23:09 UTC  

well when CDC says only 6% of the total number are from covid that's a very large gap

2021-01-05 19:23:45 UTC  

please send that to me, I would love to read it

2021-01-05 19:23:47 UTC  

so it'd be a couple hundred thousand off

2021-01-05 19:23:50 UTC  

Not being offensive but where do you live@chaz

2021-01-05 19:24:08 UTC  

America

2021-01-05 19:24:23 UTC  

State big city?

2021-01-05 19:24:28 UTC  

I'm in WV

2021-01-05 19:24:59 UTC  

You're arguing with a dumb hillbilly

2021-01-05 19:25:07 UTC  

Just so you know

2021-01-05 19:25:50 UTC  

your argueing with a pertentious city dweller who thinks too highly of themselves, I'm in a blue state, but half my family is texan and rebulican, so I have a healthy diversity of thought

2021-01-05 19:25:54 UTC  

i'm sure it's somewhere

2021-01-05 19:26:02 UTC  

ok

2021-01-05 19:26:31 UTC  

I'm not calling you out just trying to place a name to an area

2021-01-05 19:26:41 UTC  

but still if we take the numbers GIVEN BY THE CDC then we have a mortality rate of 3.7422037422037%

2021-01-05 19:26:57 UTC  

I just gave you a list of things to make fun of me for

2021-01-05 19:27:10 UTC  

but we're looking for deaths FROM covid

2021-01-05 19:27:18 UTC  

Every stereotype I've heard it

2021-01-05 19:27:24 UTC  

Trust me

2021-01-05 19:27:37 UTC  

and 9.6 million with further health condition for the rest of their life