Oh

I guess a Sherman

👍

Peewee Sherman

> @AnonRed A hate crime is defined as _"a crime, typically one involving violence, that is motivated by prejudice on the basis of race, religion, sexual orientation, or other grounds."_
> And since the BLM movement is represented by the following:
> "
> We are working for a world where Black lives are no longer systematically targeted for demise.
> We affirm our humanity, our contributions to this society, and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression.
> The call for Black lives to matter is a rallying cry for ALL Black lives striving for liberation."
>
> Couldn't it be said that simply targeting anyone with BLM is an overt aggressive act against black Americans?
@kriegor191 If you're not *directly* attacking a Black person because of their race alone, then it's **not** a hate crime to attack someone of the same race as you that supports a (violent) movement. And BLM does more harm than good, no matter what quote they put on their website. The leaders are just Marxists and only support the black people that believe they are victims. It's as flawed as a movement for Black people as PETA is for animal rights. They can say they care all they want, but if they do nothing helpful, then what's the point of seeing them as "good"?

Based on Race or anything they believe, huh

> Is t anon red the one who said ANTIFA is not technically a domestic terrorist org
@Deleted User I do not support ANTIFA <:dogekek:726878872607653918> I'm not the person who said that.

I do a lot of Hate crimin then

Hey its billy with his small willy

@AnonRed the supporting if it and the lack of support for making it a terrorist organization are two different things. I have no doubt you think they are thugs. But I could be thinking of someone else

Great offense

Not sure how people would know what is going on down there in Australia

They are a terrorist organization, and I hate them just as much as anyone else on here would(that knows the same thing). I think it's someone else you're thinking of, because I never said anything pertaining to ANTIFA besides calling violent protesters idiots somewhere in these chats. @Deleted User

<:KEK:726877368601411624> I'm not a leftist. I'm Authoritarian Right on that compass quiz if you look in <#727616207619883128> from like 2 months ago.

Thomas

oops

https://discordapp.com/channels/707691030748594288/727615870385389638/738851213545701536

Thomas

<@727290706682576916> why are you pinging people?

https://youtu.be/-nOWDDu-eNo

@Mauler you sexy ass beast

Um

The Seattle mayor is such an incompetent bitch

As a resident of Seattle I won’t take that back

Jay Inslee is a pansy too

I just found out Anthony Fauci and Tony Fauci are the same person. I'm big brain, don't mind me.

We’ve all done something similar

😅

Ah yes, I remember the time that I... wait... better not talk about it

Now I'm curious <:ScreamingLiberal:720120350947541065>

😆

You know the thing

<:emoji_9:723005092764319776>

> @kriegor191 If you're not *directly* attacking a Black person because of their race alone, then it's **not** a hate crime to attack someone of the same race as you that supports a (violent) movement. And BLM does more harm than good, no matter what quote they put on their website. The leaders are just Marxists and only support the black people that believe they are victims. It's as flawed as a movement for Black people as PETA is for animal rights. They can say they care all they want, but if they do nothing helpful, then what's the point of seeing them as "good"?
@AnonRed So you _aren't_ associating the movement with a class of people. How would you think the prosecutor/plaintiff would address people who attacked the BLM activists? It doesn't necessarily require a person to say a pejorative about an individual for an assault to warrant a "hate" crime. This would allow the prosecution the ability to say that an afront against BLM _could_ be a hate crime. If your view is the one used however as the defense (assaulter), all the defense would need to convey is that the class of person (race) _is_ the requirement, not the position they hold about an individual. Thats an easy point to stand on. I like it.

Any concluding thoughts on the topic? Any possible flaws in your own logic that I might not be seeing. I recommend asking yourself, if the shoe was on the other foot, how would you defend or attack (in a manner of speaking of course) in court. Im not expecting a response on this, but it helps in the mental exercise.

Trying to find your own weaknesses is important because you can expect which rebuttal and mentally prepare a counter argument.

I feel we're on the tail end of this conversation.

O

O

O

you know, the more i look back at history, the more i start seein and realizing how much of the US military has been made up of Southerners since after the end of the Civil War and has started gettin me to thinkin, why is that? Why is it that since the Civil War that the military is made up of majority of Southerners? Does the North really value our tenacity and battle filled spirits? Or do they want to exploit it to fill their Imperialistic needs? Are we just tools to them to be discarded later after we are broken and rendered useless by the horrors of war? And when they started realizing that the South was starting to put up a stiff resistance to their "voluntary" recruitment campaigns where they made promises of valor and glory and started instituting the Draft? The population of the North has always been far greater than here in the South, so why doesnt the military have a majority of its serving members be from the North even when the Draft is activated? Or am i just thinking about this way to hard and just thinking silly thoughts? Or is this a clever method by the North to keep us down by sacrificing large swaths of our population to fullfill their needs?

@Zilla How far south?

Im down in Texas@Rogual95

must be nice