This was 34 min ago

On NYT

And NYT is an unbiased source?

I'm not saying that, they're extremely biased source biased against the cops so....

Less biased than TYT

Your source came from Twitter

“only one out of nearly a dozen”

Huh

Maybe it’s because

I dunno

**it was the middle of the night**

Lol AND the suspect shot at the cops first AFTER they announced they were there.. which they didnt have to

I'm just done with this "justice"

I guess I'm not sure which side you're taking on this...

The police

Okay. So we are on the same side...

I'd look into my "Twitter" source. Rather small youtuber who does criminal break downs, and probably read the case documents that are public.

I was saying if the nyt is willing to say the police had a warrant, why the heck are we charging them with murder

Breonna shouldn't have been there, and it's not like you can check if someone is there when you're being shot at

Well, the one that is being charged is the one that shot in the direction where the person shooting at them wasn't. Breonna was a part of the drug investigation, as well. Either way, wasn't sure what side you were taking and was a bit concerned.

Pardon my bad English but SHIT HAPPENS, and I bet the cop feels terrible as it is

And yeah I know she was being investigated

Yeah, I agree.

And they have all these pics of her wearing the uniform holding flowers....

Make her look more innocent

And I wasnt really saying your source on twitter was a bad one @Froski my point was just that if the NYT who wants to spin this against the cops is saying things regarding the no knock being "not enough" to excuse the officers behavior.. I just get angry with all the spin.. getting old.. got old.

I see where you are coming from. I think Sean is great source to get the end picture.

Even Fox News is disappointing

CNN actually reported real news this time they got it right on july 32rd

23rd*

lmao how did that happen

You know, i think iv realised one of the reasons why the EU has been as unsuccessful as an attempt at a federationesque deal compared to America. they do not have a region independant of any country that sits as the governing location (like DC for America) of the EU. Instead they have the leading bodies of the EU reside in one country (currently Germany) which has lead its high members to fulfill their own self indulgences for their home country instead of the Federation as a whole, which is what has lead to many nations like Britian pulling out because their needs to survive were being tramppled on by the likes of Germany and France

And why Poland is saying F you to the EU after having its funding stripped away for various reasons and being footed a large part of the bill

the success of the EU has a lot to do with the fact that America took over protecting them

look at the size of their militaries... I think the UK has by far the largest

basically we charge all of europe to be their defense force... and it has been this way pretty much since WWII

yeah

@Zilla that is the main reason the EU even has an economy today because they don't have a massive military budget. If America cut just the military budget down to what say France spends on their military which is around 10-20b per year... We wouldn't even have a national deficit if we could cut our military budget down to EU levels 🙂

I know a few people are crying "US spends 750b on military when they aren't even in a war kek".... I laugh and told a few of them that if the USA didn't have to protect half of Asia and all of Europe then we wouldn't need to spend but 350b or so on our Military

mhm

the EU was great in theory but it was just ultimately going to fail spectacularly like it is now