Message from @ManOWar
Discord ID: 605621831877001256
Giving women power is funny because nobody cares about old women, so wouldn’t that defeat the purpose of empowerment
i've got a lot of shit to do for the cause, but i have to prioritize actual work. i mean to do what the FSP did: analyze laws in many states to see which is the most hospitable for a patriarchal enclave. it still looks like Utah, but there is the danger of Mormons becoming hostile and fucking us over
^
Missouri has the best gun laws and great home-schooling laws, but shitty laws elsewhere
Utah is pretty good
They're one of the best
I’m going to look for that ted talk
I'll be in Missouri
yeah, it'll probably end up being Utah, but i'll put rigor into determining that
Missouri has the mountains
Which I love
I’m going to look for that ted talk
The Ozarks are like my sanctuary
well, that's the end of my dicking around tonight
alright
I think I may take a more backseat approach to things in discord from now on
That de escalated quickly
Nothing like Miles Davis man
youtu (.) be/ezVk1ahRF78 7 50 is where he starts and 9 50 is where says it blatanly
I mean 9 20
And that’s basically what feminism promotes
@ManOWar yea
The one that has like 1 million views
Reee legion bebes
@Nawalter Jizney LoL
I’m interested do non religious people have a lot of babies? , I thought they were just making jokes when they say only religious people have babies
*alot
Generally irreligious have fewer children yes
Hmm that’s interesting
Statistically I mean
yeah
I see, I have to research why, that’s kind of deep
It is intuitive
Well on the surface it makes sense
@ManOWar explain
Religion is one of the main factors promoting traditional families
Right, but wouldn’t you think that smart people even if they had no religion would have babies, because those who reproduce win?
The irreligious lack that external drive. So they have fewer kids would be my guess
Ah I see
the smarter people generally did have kids