Giving women power is funny because nobody cares about old women, so wouldn’t that defeat the purpose of empowerment

i've got a lot of shit to do for the cause, but i have to prioritize actual work. i mean to do what the FSP did: analyze laws in many states to see which is the most hospitable for a patriarchal enclave. it still looks like Utah, but there is the danger of Mormons becoming hostile and fucking us over

^

Missouri has the best gun laws and great home-schooling laws, but shitty laws elsewhere

Utah is pretty good

They're one of the best

I’m going to look for that ted talk

I'll be in Missouri

yeah, it'll probably end up being Utah, but i'll put rigor into determining that

Missouri has the mountains

Which I love

I’m going to look for that ted talk

The Ozarks are like my sanctuary

well, that's the end of my dicking around tonight

alright

I think I may take a more backseat approach to things in discord from now on

That de escalated quickly

Nothing like Miles Davis man

youtu (.) be/ezVk1ahRF78 7 50 is where he starts and 9 50 is where says it blatanly

I mean 9 20

is it religion and babies?

And that’s basically what feminism promotes

@ManOWar yea

The one that has like 1 million views

Reee legion bebes

@Nawalter Jizney LoL

I’m interested do non religious people have a lot of babies? , I thought they were just making jokes when they say only religious people have babies

*alot

Generally irreligious have fewer children yes

Hmm that’s interesting

Statistically I mean

yeah

I see, I have to research why, that’s kind of deep

It is intuitive

Well on the surface it makes sense

@ManOWar explain

Religion is one of the main factors promoting traditional families

Right, but wouldn’t you think that smart people even if they had no religion would have babies, because those who reproduce win?

The irreligious lack that external drive. So they have fewer kids would be my guess

Ah I see

the smarter people generally did have kids