Pfft Chernobyl

Of course, just because its better doesnt mean we can just switch over to it like that, but over time we need too

We wouldn’t be able to go full nueclear

That was a mistake on that part

It cost too much

hillary did chernobyl btw

Hillary is Chernobyl

The Soviets were careless with that technology and didn’t prepare for that

**Hangs himself**

Nuclear energy is the way to go.

That Hitlery @DθGΣΉ

trying to say Chernobyl is a good argument against Nuclear Energy is stupid

Welcome, <@!726947163115880589>.

While yes but it’s hella expensive

i just watched zero dark thirty

We have better tech now since Chernobyl

Especially for a country larger than the EU

and was doing some research on al qaeda

Yes

Preventing meltdowns

High up front cost, yes, but the operating cost and efficiency are off the CHARTS

But cost bro

^

Cost

its a long term investment as well.

and i realized that i mightve been a bit too free with my google searches

uh oh lol

im pretty sure my government is watching me

No ones gonna look for the long term

The next gen of reactors literally cannot melt down

Just the Short term

every government watches their people, its naive to think otherwise

If I do be president tho I’d promote Nuclear Energy than oil and coal and renewables combined

We don’t need to be greedy with Arabs no more

my government also acts, besides the watching...😬

We can use our own land for Nuclear Power

Arabs are too busy smoking shisha and making it rain on belly dancers

> If I do be president tho I’d promote Nuclear Energy than oil and coal and renewables combined
@IncompetentGeneral yes but we need more electronic cars bc of performance not even bc of SaViNg ThE pLaNeT

Yes, there have been a few Nuclear failures, @Deleted User, but that doesnt mean its not an amazing energy alternative. There have been far more failures with green energy solutions, and coal power/mining is famously dangerous

i love electronic cars

but