biden had very low key i agree with you type questions

Prisoners and free citizens are the most obvious example. Citizens and non-citizens is also applicable.

@Arkayde sure, convicts have to some extent denied and renounced their civilian status and the rights that come with this privilege

in that sense, prison makes sense

Pog champ dinner time

So there exist conditions by which "rights for me but not for thee" is not bullshit.

you can lose the privilege if you become a felon/criminal etc

@Arkayde I'm only defending law abiding citizens of the galaxy, mate

criminals and felons are not my constituents

they don't even vote, brooooo 🙂

They put a furry in <#724105551700557824> <:ScreamingLiberal:720120350947541065> <:ScreamingLiberal2:760246375815839785> <:Greta:720119386668531763>

i'm not nothing if not a savvy space politician, mate

Depends on the state. Prisoners, no; felons, maybe.

maybe

but then again: they forfeited the privilege when they started a life of crimes and misdemeanors

they aren't my citizens 🙂

woah bro

You shouldn't

rephrase that

Any one have a among us code?

Another rally damn

"Rights for thee not for me" is only bullshit in the optics it applies to law abiding people

it doesn't apply to non citizens and criminals: nor do they deserve the privilege

rewarding mediocrity is only furthering mediocrity

they do still deserve constitutional rights though

they are still humans

they just don't have the same rights anymore

i do believe there is a humane way to deal with convicts and criminals

right to a lawyer or cruel and unusually punishment

geneva convention is a document i have ratified

human rights are rights; citizen rights are privileges.

i would not tolerate torture or inhumane treatment

exactly

there are basic human rights

and those should always be upheld

ortherwise you guys wouldn't be humans 🙂

you'd be... monsters 🙂

I could Identify as an attack helicopter

damn... that's cliché

you don't know

not enough love for other helis