Message from @ninni._.burninni

Discord ID: 767044299342479360


2020-10-17 15:17:37 UTC  

but wouldn't that let more fraud? since its more floating around who you voted?

2020-10-17 15:17:47 UTC  

> @ninni._.burninni you find 90% of conversations boring and if we only talk about what you find interesting the chat would stay dead
@Lucario well fuck u

2020-10-17 15:17:50 UTC  

in theory that destroys the mentality of "lesser of two evils", that is, "I like x candidate but I think y candidate (who i despise) will win so I will vote for z candidate (of who I am indifferent or despise less)

2020-10-17 15:18:02 UTC  
2020-10-17 15:18:02 UTC  

You would have technically voted for everyone and no one at the same time

2020-10-17 15:18:11 UTC  

not necessarily

2020-10-17 15:18:11 UTC  

I will say its an interesting idea

2020-10-17 15:18:18 UTC  

^

2020-10-17 15:18:24 UTC  

I still dont know what its for though

2020-10-17 15:18:26 UTC  

you can be limited to a scale of three candidates that you can choose

2020-10-17 15:18:48 UTC  

I think thats more of a problem with America only really having 2 parties

2020-10-17 15:18:59 UTC  

ranked choice is the same as, if you're voting third party, you're wasting your vote, so vote blue so we can get rid of the electoral college to give third parties a larger chance at getting the presidency

2020-10-17 15:19:13 UTC  

which is exactly why we need to get rid of the electoral college

2020-10-17 15:19:21 UTC  

> ranked choice is the same as, if you're voting third party, you're wasting your vote, so vote blue so we can get rid of the electoral college to give third parties a larger chance at getting the presidency
@Squibbo no, that's not how RCV works

2020-10-17 15:19:25 UTC  

that's how FPTP works

2020-10-17 15:19:27 UTC  

I think 10 is a bit to much, but the 2 that we have told all the power

2020-10-17 15:20:00 UTC  

> ranked choice is the same as, if you're voting third party, you're wasting your vote, so vote blue so we can get rid of the electoral college to give third parties a larger chance at getting the presidency
@Squibbo ehhhhhhhh no, so far I do not see a democrat politician I want running anything in my life

2020-10-17 15:20:03 UTC  

Sorry I'm on my fucking period

2020-10-17 15:20:04 UTC  

Blue would change alot of things, and that wouldnt all be for allowing for power to other parties

2020-10-17 15:20:11 UTC  

You're all being assholes

2020-10-17 15:20:19 UTC  

Gross

2020-10-17 15:20:20 UTC  

Calling me boring and shit

2020-10-17 15:20:20 UTC  

Do you have no self awareness?

2020-10-17 15:20:34 UTC  

We are having a discussion about politics on a political discord

2020-10-17 15:20:35 UTC  

Its the internet idc

2020-10-17 15:20:45 UTC  

That shit is boring

2020-10-17 15:20:50 UTC  

it's close enough, the electoral college is there for a reason, i don't want urban centers deciding for the entire country.

2020-10-17 15:21:06 UTC  

> That shit is boring
@ninni._.burninni You're boring.

2020-10-17 15:21:22 UTC  

sherly temple

2020-10-17 15:21:28 UTC  

but also random

2020-10-17 15:21:28 UTC  

dk who that is lmoa

2020-10-17 15:21:28 UTC  

That's my main problem with getting rid of it without having a direct way of still countering mob rule

2020-10-17 15:21:31 UTC  

hey, LA needs your water. federal mandate to take your resources.

2020-10-17 15:21:31 UTC  

Idk why you warned me I was just hating my life

2020-10-17 15:21:39 UTC  

Read rule thirteen.

2020-10-17 15:21:42 UTC  

I don't care about you helping me

2020-10-17 15:21:44 UTC  

Go hate your life in #weebs chat

2020-10-17 15:21:46 UTC  

So fucking stupid

2020-10-17 15:21:54 UTC  

DB, that doesnt exist anymore