I'm only 19 lol remember the saying of how when you get older you become more conservative lol

It's been left in the dust

Shameful

They're using NATO as a shield to not fix it ''oh but there wont be another war''
Aint that what they said after the first one of the world?

Alrighty I'll see y'all later bye!

Meme culture has inducted a ton of the soon to be voters into the conservative thinking

Breyer potentially could become vacant. He’s what, 78?

I just don't like bureaucrats dictating me what to think. I've had enough of this peer pressure they're tryna do.

A few years ago, our soldiers had to yell bang bang in training exercises because suffiecient ammunition was not money for

> They're using NATO as a shield to not fix it ''oh but there wont be another war''
> Aint that what they said after the first one of the world?
The league of nations was way different that NATO though

Yeah

True. But refusing to believe another war will happen and hiding under NATO

The UN is fucked as well

The Netherlands is the Export of Europe but ''were fine theres totally no threat''

''maybe a little russia oh but well let the USA handle that''

Are there any Mods in here right now?

is their mindset

I am actually almost against military intervention, I think a country should only intervene if it's the last thing they should be doing. I think that diplomacy can keep it under control mostly. But we still need to get the military ready, just in case. 😉 😈

Yes. @Mackerell why?

Agreed, but I do think a strong military would help tremendously with that.

I've have a pic that is hilarious. I just wanted to know that it is funny and would like to share it with everyone without getting a warning.

> True. But refusing to believe another war will happen and hiding under NATO
Refusing is a pretty negative term to use; hoping or striving would be a better fit. Isn't it better to "Hide" behind NATO than to risk a war?

You can DM it to me, but probably not going into General.

The problem is the UN should be the ones intervening in human rights issues, but they somehow dont have the man power to do so, so instead the US gets pinned with it

Especially since another war would probably be nuclear

Seriously.

Well, the military would be strong, just that it'd act when needed. Not any time there's disagreement. Diplomacy is actually good for both sides.

Nah, if war breaks out world leaders are smart enough not to use nukes. It will be guerrila warfare and cyber attacks.

And the US gets blamed for not doing anything and also blamed when they do do something

If a country decides to nuke or do something really dangerous, **yes.** No more diplomacy, some things **just** need to get solved.

At this point The Netherlands isnt putting enough money into their military to be part of EUROPE

> Nah, if war breaks out world leaders are smart enough not to use nukes. It will be guerrila warfare and cyber attacks.
Smart enough? They will use the same logic as before during ww2, end the war quickly to save money and more lives

And if not that, we'll have another cold war

> And the US gets blamed for not doing anything and also blamed when they do do something
@Tex <Several People are typing> lol

know where i could post edgy memes

The only way the US can get hit is by cyber and small cells setup long ago, no standing army is gonna make it to US soil

Propagandistic and cultural wars are really effective.

No, because they know what MAD is, Mutually Agreed Destruction. You fire nukes at me? I will fire all of them back at you AND your friends.

We don't need armies anymore when we have agitators and activists. 😉

Just look at the US education system.

> know where i could post edgy memes
@guarddog We don't have an "edgy meme" section. They tend to cross lines.