Message from @SpaceDandyJoestarGG

Discord ID: 783876617163898931


2020-12-03 02:04:28 UTC  

Absolutely not

2020-12-03 02:04:33 UTC  

Kamala is a man

2020-12-03 02:04:35 UTC  

EXTREME SUCC

2020-12-03 02:04:47 UTC  

I mean, you’re not wrong

2020-12-03 02:04:50 UTC  

ummmmmmmm

2020-12-03 02:04:56 UTC  

how would getting rid of 230 make it esier for big tech to sensor?

2020-12-03 02:04:59 UTC  

ben is hawt agree

2020-12-03 02:04:59 UTC  

I don’t understand Kamala Harris

2020-12-03 02:05:00 UTC  

just watch.... in 4 months Biden will suffer a massive heartattack mysteriously enough and Kamala will be prez

2020-12-03 02:05:04 UTC  

it wouldn't

2020-12-03 02:05:07 UTC  

ben is a gamer

2020-12-03 02:05:16 UTC  

ben is married

2020-12-03 02:05:16 UTC  

with 230 they can do it and cry 230 when ever someone poitns it out

2020-12-03 02:05:21 UTC  

Steven crowder?

2020-12-03 02:05:23 UTC  

That’s not true at all

2020-12-03 02:05:27 UTC  

Ben's wife is a doctor by the way

2020-12-03 02:05:31 UTC  

Definitely not hot

2020-12-03 02:05:34 UTC  

guys the left is progressive by ushering in a career politician and an ex cop!

2020-12-03 02:05:36 UTC  

Did you know she's a doctor!

2020-12-03 02:05:41 UTC  

without 230 big tech can't use 230, so they can finally get put in timeout for being meany heads

2020-12-03 02:05:49 UTC  

Bet you didn't know she's a doctor

2020-12-03 02:05:56 UTC  

But she's a doctor

2020-12-03 02:05:58 UTC  

what!

2020-12-03 02:06:00 UTC  

you didn't know he was

2020-12-03 02:06:04 UTC  

but what about james klug?

2020-12-03 02:06:05 UTC  

ben's wife was a doctor?

2020-12-03 02:06:07 UTC  

so was Ronald Regan

2020-12-03 02:06:09 UTC  

no way

2020-12-03 02:06:20 UTC  

Without 230 small tech also can’t use 230, and have even more trouble surviving

2020-12-03 02:06:25 UTC  

@The high priest of god-TOAD I know crazy yeah she's a doctor

2020-12-03 02:06:26 UTC  

We shouldn’t strive to remove 230

2020-12-03 02:06:29 UTC  

But to transform it

2020-12-03 02:06:37 UTC  

Protect sites that don’t editorialize

2020-12-03 02:06:37 UTC  

No

2020-12-03 02:06:41 UTC  

Don’t protect sites that do

2020-12-03 02:06:44 UTC  

That simple

2020-12-03 02:06:48 UTC  

Yes but as the progressive anti cop party, you’d think they’d stop and evaluate before voting for someone who locked up black people for weed Possesion

2020-12-03 02:06:57 UTC  

what does edetorialize meen

2020-12-03 02:06:58 UTC  

Yo @KittyTheBitty calm down

2020-12-03 02:07:01 UTC  

name one small tech company that uses 230 to hide behind after censoring people on their public platforms

2020-12-03 02:07:14 UTC  

hey