Without 230 small tech also can’t use 230, and have even more trouble surviving

@The high priest of god-TOAD I know crazy yeah she's a doctor

We shouldn’t strive to remove 230

But to transform it

Protect sites that don’t editorialize

No

Don’t protect sites that do

That simple

Yes but as the progressive anti cop party, you’d think they’d stop and evaluate before voting for someone who locked up black people for weed Possesion

what does edetorialize meen

Yo @KittyTheBitty calm down

name one small tech company that uses 230 to hide behind after censoring people on their public platforms

hey

tiktok

guys

Daddy Trump

guys

tiktok isn't small nor censors people for their politics, from what I've seen that is

daddy trump

I agree

Hey

Wth is happening in here?

tik tok is gei

Not to hide behind, to operate under. Most small platforms use it. Any platform who hosts content does it.

drumpf!!!!! drumpf bad!!!

Ben Shapiro simp?

Scroll up

idk xD Trump is everyones daddy

No, you are Patrick

Tiktok is cringe tbh

.warn @BobaMilkTea no homophobia

Well since Ben is jewish I don't think kneeling to pray does much.... idk.... Does the jewish faith kneel to pray?

what do I do

I got banned for saying there was no collusion

asked for evidence

they say "mueller reports"

A content sharing platform REQUIRES safe harbor laws

Wait there isn’t rules about homophobia

Even discord could have trouble operating without them

wtf