complaints have been made last 3 classes before us about it

he only changed slightly points around

one of those test where you get more points more bullshit you write

Didactics prof is some bigwig in the linguistics field. He intends for "us" to become very research-active, as he himself put it.

aka "i dont care about you... do your stuff at your freetime im only here to rate you"

?

Odd that the test hasn't been circulated among students. 🤔

on top of that it was test where calculation examples were supposed to be given with thest

No no. As in when we're accredited teachers he wants us to be active in research as well.

yeah... but they were wrong and the calculus paper was missing some things and stuff

ahh then its good

Good fucking job. Is that guy getting fired or what?

Sounds super incompetent.

only place i think you cant actualy teach by "up to date things" is languages

and even on those you can somewhat update current schemes

that guy... nope still our teacher

we made (yet another) complaint about him

and sent it to all those 4 locations

Lucky me. I'm gonna be teaching English primarily. 👍

our school has this policy that _every_ official complain needs to be viewed by schoolboard + student org with them and talk about it

previously it has not worked

maybe this time they take the hint

Old media could potentially be used to some effect.

as we collected (with assist of IT-staff and some social engineering) old complaints about him too

and included them in that one

yeah

we hope that collected datapacket is more effective

than single complain from X-Y ammount of students per year

Could be. Maybe they just need a reminder.

but yeah that test... he was looking for _hotwords_ from said texts etc ... also 3 question test where it is 80% from final number from course

last question was where there was no "right" answer

only points you got was if you remembered the hotwords and that "customer decides what he wants from product"

<:chink:323022148870602752>

so yeah .,. those 30 points (10 per question) were 80% from course number

first class for first year students... many weaker willed people were planning/talking about switching fields and/or quiting due "if shit is this hard later on"

test itself was not hard but unfair and ridiculous when you ask about stuff he never teached or talked about

on top of that the study material on web-portal was ... scanned transparent sheets where the ink was spread due scanner glass

Definitely. I'm assuming you're bringing that up too.

yep

its all in there

stuff like this https://lambda.sx/Ngp.png