Yeah
didnt robert lee oppose that or something
Yes
<:BanHammer:767180158100570158>
He also actively advocated for a southern anti slavery party
did that opposition affect the outcome of the slaves future
Along with several other rebel generals
Abraham Lincoln was beard jesus
Trump is orange jesus
would it have to be realistic, or could we just rewrite, physics and logic out of bounds?
Realistic
Which was apparently very popular in Louisiana
*damn it*
And I asked mcfucktard
<:KEK:726877368601411624>
No u
I'd probably give it actual fucking material instead of "slavery bad south bad yanks good"
Which is what it's always boiled down too
Yes because the confederates were idiots
Instead of the very complicated situation it actually was
This is what I鈥檓 trying to say lol
Is that why the north had it
North literally had slave states
I mean you can't defend slavery. . . period
I think that's just a fact, it's completely unjustifiable by any means
Literally who is doing that
Not even southerners liked fucking slavery
the confederates were
Regardless of if you like it or not one of the causes of the civil war is slavery and slavery is arguably the root cause of all the other causes that branch out
Why are yall talking bout slavery
Holy fucking shit
They literally didnt
It kept them poor as dirt
the large structured slave labor-ran plantations liked slavery
Yea
and the confederates defended that institution
literally with their lives
Cuz they didnt have to pay people to work lmao
Actually they survived the panic of 1837 with their agriculture economy, they blossomed from slavery
Ok
Slavery held back the economics of the south
