they are the enemy of something called being a normal person

aka

they been peddling insanity for years

Common sense

^^

their whole platform is saying the contrary of what trump says

it's completely bonkers

When will the Dems be marked as enemies of the state...

TDS is real

and i agree Spidey

wait. if trump endorses the left, doesnt it mean they gonna start bashing themselves?

they are close to seditious if not full blown traitorous

someone could make the case

if I was to build a case on the democrats, there's no shortage of media footage of them fueling the fire

it wouldn't even be difficult to get the evidence

Ahem ahem Benghazi ahem ahem

just in the past 8 months they been creating unrest

just the footage from the last 8 months would be damming evidence

you have people from all levels of government inciting unrest on the left and you could probably argue it if you really wanted to hurt them on their unpatriotic stance of late

just need a bunch of gung ho lawyers and an army of them 🙂

Like the guy defending rittenhouse and then some

he had a whole firm behind him

same with the maga hat kid

these things are cases with tons of manpower behind them

Uhhh

Kyle Rittenhouse has the same firm the MAGA hat kid has...

exactly

and they have tons of paralegals reading case files

how do you think these cases happened so expediently?

they were built fast due to the paralegals doing the brunt of the reading work

judges and lawyers do favors for each other

The benghazi kinda started since 2012

Hillary was the Secretary of state at that time sooo

then, Obama was supposed to bring back 4 troops home or something

but then

he didn't bring them back, he said he was too busy, and then, the soldiers were left to die.

That's the stuff :p

well....WASHINGTON (CN) – The D.C. Circuit affirmed dismissal Tuesday of claims against Hillary Clinton by parents whose sons died in the 2012 attacks on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya.

Patricia Smith and Charles Woods sued Clinton in 2014, claiming the former secretary of state defamed them and falsely told them in a September 2012 meeting that the Sept. 11, 2012, attack was incited by an anti-Muslim YouTube video.

Alleging wrongful-death and negligence claims as well, the complaint suggested that Clinton’s careless use of private email server for government business allowed the attack plotters to exploit sensitive information for their plan.

Smith and Woods appealed after a federal court judge dismissed the case, and the D.C. Circuit affirmed Tuesday.

Agreeing that the lower court properly substituted the United States for Clinton as a defendant, today’s ruling says that Clinton’s emails were transmitted as part of her official work for the government, even when using a private server.

“Regardless of whether or not these activities were conducted properly or lawfully, those types of communications fall within the heartland of her duties as secretary of state,” the unsigned opinion states.

As for Clinton disputing how the parents characterized their meeting, the ruling says such statements did not amount to defamation or cast them in a false light because she did not go so far as to accuse them of lying.

“Because Clinton merely disagreed with Smith and Woods’ recollection of events and couched this disagreement in sympathy, no reasonable person could conclude that Clinton’s statements put Smith and Woods in a ‘highly offensive’ false light,” the opinion states.

Neither the State Department nor Larry Klayman, the attorney who represents Smith and Woods, immediately responded to requests for comment on the ruling.

@reckon

that's what I can remember in the court case...

oh ok...