here maybe have a read of this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_the_War_on_Drugs

@DontBeAnIdgit @Max4Z you are taking someone property

thats still against the NAP

But it’s not violent.

The question isn’t is it harmful

of course it is violent

You said non violent crimes are not crimes.

Burglary is not violent.

How is it violent?

Its iniating violence against a individual and or his property

no it is not

you know the NAP and you are just making pointless ranting beacuse I said non violent CRIMES arent CRIMES

So, we have the dissents, which I tend to agree with saying the drug prohibition should not be allowed through the interstate commerce act. However, the law at that point is the majority opinion, which did allow it under the interstate commerce act. Now, would you like to make the argument as to which amendment the interstate commerce act is under

I am not even american

all I want is mister goverment to fuck off

Aggression is different from violence

You can be aggressive without being violent

If I angrily yell and scream in your face, it’s aggression.

If I punch you in the face or start to get ready to, it is violence.

I dont wanna be in this class anymore

violence is an aggression

But I need to pass

Yes. But aggression isn’t violence.

Squares and Rectangles.

what ever I am all for the NAP

Drug war is useless

and destroyed massive numbers of lives

Were talking about ahaumd abureys death <a:WHEEZE:705993756486402068>

and it didnt limit the supply

> Were talking about ahaumd abureys death :WHEEZE:
@Fatbwoy Jogger’s gonna jog

I can’t wait for jogger to become a slur

it already was

but didnt manage to become popular

The drug war banned the distribution across state lines through the interstate commerce act. That was the basis. Pointless, possibly, but legal under the interstate commerce act, probably.

its still cringe they banned capitalism

ikr

oh fuck me

I mean, it was more a regulation of commerce crossing state lines so state's didn't tax the hell out of certain products that were simply being sent to another U.S. state. Not a ban of capitalism, just a control the Federal government is allotted due to relations between states falling to the federal government.

aight I’m gonna head out I’ve had enough autism for today

Banning trade with certain substances is a ban on industry

meaning its a partial ban of capitalism