so its effectivly the same

But we aren’t talking about lowering the number of jobs

but can we stop talking about pointless terms

We were, actually

We are talking about outright *banning* them

Your just backing up to semantics while understanding the meaning of what he was trying to convey

There was a gaffe, fuck it, you know the intent

a job is service for exchange of money if you make minimum wage regulations all jobs under this minimum wage are banned

Not true

absolutely true

you made it illegal to provide a job under this minimum wagw

If you are a stubborn prick that absolutely refuses to pay more

so you banned it

The job isn’t illegal

yes it is

I’ll repeat myself

I am gonna repeat myself too

you made it illegal to provide a job under this minimum wagw

**THE JOB ISN’T ILLEGAL, THE ACT OF PAYING UNDER A CERTAIN AMOUNT FOR SAID JOB IS YOU ABSOLUTE MONGALOID**

IT’S NOT MAKING IT SO YOU HAVE TO STOP DOING THE JOB

Yeah you banned the jobs that were payed under minimum wage

No

yes

Or else every fucking job would be banned

no beacuse there are jobs above minimum wage

Servers make under minimum wage

Exactly

Not only couldn’t you name a job that was banned because of the minimum wage

A job just got named that still exists despite being under the minimum wage

Jesus Christ

> Not only couldn’t you name a job that was banned because of the minimum wage
@DontBeAnIdgit like I said this is a macroeconomic debate no examples here

😳

Wh

What.

Yeah, there are no examples because they don’t exist

Bruh I dont know any job place that shut down beacuse they couldnt afford minimum wage and I dont need to

Well you kinda do if you are gonna argue that minimum wage bans jobs

we are talking about theoretical macroeconomy

theoretical

Therefore

Fiction