^

There isnt anything to back up in a macroeconomics

me wondering why zeds Sunday vid can’t come any sooner 😩😩

you guys dont understand what macroeconomics is

Fuck

Yes, but you're making a claim that should be super easy to prove.

General 2 did make me mad

exactly

You are failing to prove a claim you made

> Yes, but you're making a claim that should be super easy to prove.
@DarkSkyKEC he wants me to find some random job that got shut down

do y’all know what semiconductor devices is

Me neither 😂

Jobs getting shut down isn't the equivalent of jobs being banned.

how the fuck am I supposed to find some report about a job that shut down beacuse of minimum wage

Simple google search

“Jobs made illegal because minimum wage”

Jobs might shut down because of minimum wage, but they aren't "banned."

^^^

oop

> Jobs might shut down because of minimum wage, but they aren't "banned."
@DarkSkyKEC like I already said thats just redundant

That could just mean the business is either failing or bankrupt----

HUH

WH

Isn't that what you're claiming?

You know what

It isn't the same thing in any case.

oh and its still macro economy so I am not gonna bother to search for one specific job

Since you are either too lazy or too incompetent to back up your claim I’ll do it for you

its about models and theory

<:Surprised_pikachu:726878373762301995>

The act of banning something is the act of banning something though.

I'm not really sure what you're trying to say here.

that it reduces the amount of jobs

That would make a lot more sense.

Oh look

I found **NONE**

It might have been better if you clarified that point half an hour ago.

In fact I just found more examples of jobs that pay under minimum wage

And aren’t banned

> I found **NONE**
@DontBeAnIdgit yep beacuse its way too specific of a scenario lol

No not really.