Message from @Shrimpf
Discord ID: 390646122202529792
^
Why do you say these things then
No it is not
Because I don't agree with Falangism
A version of it was implemented in Brazil in the 50s
Integralism right?
@Deleted User the Australian immigration system doesn't accept enough people because half of the immigrants are essentially monkeys
Also in Chile in the 70s
Kek
Chile was terrible
Under both leaders
Low skilled labor @Droidbot?
Tho I suppose one was better than the other
Low skilled labour is unnescessary
The Commie would have ruined the country
Anyway
>Nation means one thing to everyone
True
Otherwise this server would be called "polandshitgeneral"
Ask any person what it means to be Dutch within the Netherlands
And you'll get a different answer
Quite ironic Allende killed himself with the rifle Castro gave him
pollacks are too lazy to mass produce shit XD
Lol
Kek
Are you implying there used to be a shared idea of nation?
When
Now when you had asked that question 80 years ago. In a way that is not vague as fuck
When we were Belgae and Germanica
When we were HRE
When we were Spain
When we were France
"what is the vision of the nation" is more honest
And relevant
It has always been vague
Because nation is subjective
No
Also @Droidbot I guess then the system is doing its job with accepting desirable people, those usually highly educated