defunding doesn’t mean abolishing

No they need wayyy less

What?

@katewilson222 join vc

Yes they need to stop having assault weapons from the military

what about funding the police more to get the training and right cops on the team

Police calls on average take 9 minutes Moreover officers arnt able to get enough training or field hours due to low funding

Ok ok want them to just have hood old pistol shotgun

For people who are caught smoking weed

Defunding police would make police less reliable, less likely to show up and double response times

Tony Timpa was killed by 3 officers kneeling on his back with his face in the dirt

Yup

Plus they got family

No it wouldn’t we take the funding from the arms

If you want to fix police then reform them and increase there funding in urban areas and cities

and less paid which means they care less about there job possibly resulting in more violence]

@katewilson222

People need food

Not the transmpirtation

joinv vc @katewilson222

Its proven that increased funding for the police results in less violent crime

In cities

more funding

had violent crime drop

since the 70s

The more police are funded the less crime there is

People should arm themselves and take more personal responsibility, be your own first responder if you can.

Its simple as that

@katewilson222

join vc

technically defunding the police would abolish them right? because they have no money to be paid or for gas or for tools

meanie

People should arm themselves but not everyone can own a gun which is why again, police

don't ghost me

Defunding the police would result in the firing of many officers

Thats why I say "should"

And even destruction of entire police departments

Cause I know some places dont allow guns unfortunately

New york is an example

i mean if police were abolished there would be no people like the guy i sent in the video and that would be sad because those were good people who arrested a bad cop right then and there

Yea exactly