They weren’t forced because it was never approved

My apologies then

They were exempt

As i was saying

@k a i You can still use context clues in that text

I might be wrong on this one I will fully admit but I have taken Hebrew for a long time

Its clearly not based on pedophilia

imagine twisting the bible

And the context clues with WORD CHOICE connects to pedophilia

Not trying to

ok

Both committed an abomination

A boy being manipulated

Against his will

cringe right

Is not an abomination on his part

It is the mans abomination

Not the boys

@bruv yup

you do realize man means a grown man

not a boy

YES

im fucking tired

besides, if a man is having sex with a boy it's still gay

you cant have your own interpretation on the bible

LMAO

lol

But instead of just gay it’s gay pedophilia

still gay

it’s still gay

HAHA

Not a lesbo but

girls are hot

Shut up

If both of them are committing an abomination it would be Gayness not Pedophilia lol

you do realize some of leviticus has to do with men sleeping with over men and vice versa for women

so? So are you saying if the Bible said a women having sex with a baby boy was a sin it would mean both straight sex and pedophilia was bad?

But it doesnt

Oh

Ok

Lmfao