Not for standing

They did chuck it. A few cases

But it would need to run the gauntlet unlike this one did

That was the main thing that surprised me about the Texas suit

Starting at the top

Well interstate issues have to be settled that way. Otherwise whose jurisdiction would it be

See

Call your legislators

I fail to see how the State of Texas is not affected by multiple states violating the Constitution regarding federal election law

Because their rights weren't violated

But they are

*Will be

Its like when you are in someone else's house you dont have expectation of privacy

If fraud puts a leader over them, that's a direct effect

But it hasn't happened yet

You also can't sue for what ifs

Its a gay reason

But the shit happens all the time

People can choose to feel disenfranchised. There was no direct taking away of their voting rights or enfranchisement.

Yes

Unfortunately

They need to refile under their own states

I see their point, I'm still mad. And still think the entire machine has reduced the Constitution to a paper

Sure there was... tons of people say their vote was not counted.

Like Arizona did

A person getting multiple votes infringes on my rights because I only get one.

@Thirsty_Fox but those people weren't being represented legally here

They skipped that step

Because their votes were counted by Texas

Im absolutely disgusted

But it confirms what I already knew

It's legal bs and why people hate lawyers is why we have to do this dancing around.

This isn't some illegal judgment

I expected something like this

The argument comes first

I dont think they explained that this affected them either

The catch with Arizona is they have physical proof of fraud.

The were literally suing them for what they did to themselves

so when do we do a civil war

in minecraft