Message from @Jin
Discord ID: 793939828445806613
Democrats be like: Shitshitshitshit! QUICK SWEEP IT UNDER THE RUG
I mean, this isn't some bullshit thing like last month. This is literally the state Judiciary committee seeing it happen in real time
Because it's ALL absentee ballots
That means every single state that used Dominion should be audited
Not just a sample size. All of them from Fulton county
Can't wait for the 'tHaT's nOt pRoOf"
Except it is
In this case it's just the smoking gun they can't ignore
Because they framed it as an issue that can come up during the runoff election
So laches doesn't apply standing wise
>implying liberals won't find a way to ignore it
They can ignore it all they want. This is a direct order from a state committee. It shoots holes in one of Dominions main claims.
They will find a way, they always do. The question is, is it big enough that it doesn't matter?
Didn't GA ignore a subpeona already before?
AZ did
Maricopa country
Aah. So GA is kinda lukewarm with the law
got subpeona'd and just said 'nah, not gonna comply'
Exactly a week from now, y'all are marching to DC?
'Yeah nah fuck you'
And that ignoring of a subpoena isn't going to work well for them
So hold on, since when can you just say fuck you to a subpoena?
Ask AZ
Subpoena'd voting machines and they're like
"Hahahahahanoandfuckyou"
The disturbing thing is I don't think anything ever came of it
All those people could easily be thrown in prison for contempt of court, and the information could be forcibly taken, but neither thing has happened as far as I know
Not only that. But that bit of news is the last thing I've ever heard from AZ
And then silence
Anyone got footage of the live hack? I been driving in the convertible.
I do have news about AZ
A judge tossed out, no surprise, the enforcement on standing because they filed to the judge that the state legislature doesn't have implied powers to have judge enforce the subpoena, but that the same judge would allow the state senate to refile citing a different state law that allows for a person authorized to subpoena to ask a judge to enforce it
@TheMousez <#778771316777549875> For the hack
It's basically a judge trying to prevent the legislature from taking powers they don't actually have.
wdym
Oh, all I saw was my name. Not the <#778771316777549875> link
oo
Will this lead anywhere however?
It is the only way for a judge to back a lawsuit that he agrees needs to be made but it was done in the wrong channels.