women should not be controlled but they should be encouraged to be valuable something for the society

Regardless, I do not believe the advancements of women’s rights in the latter 20th century has improved social cohesion or improved social conduct

doing sex work wont value to anything

No I don’t think women should be “controlled” in a dictating sense

what do you want to do with them

Re-enforce their role of being motherly

To put it simply

I don’t believe men and women do nor should have the same “experience”, treatment, and expectations

Women being equal to men hasn’t actually created any commonality or cohesion between them

GG @Operator, you just advanced to level 3!

of course not everyone is equal biologically but equal chances should be a thing

every human being deserves freedom and equality

Great now everyone can be miserable in a drain of American individualism and being exploited by corporations, we’ve achieved equality

i hate corporations too

individualism too

in fact i am anti libertarian

why should a woman, fit for doing something which many women arent fit for shouldnt have equal chances compared to men

you can drain their dream job by doing that

not many women are miners, doesnt mean a woman CANT be worker

if they are skillful and strong enough to be a miner, why should they not be one?

I’m not so much concerned with their employment opportunities as I am the degradation of motherhood and familial structure

of course housewives are essential for a better family but if we force them to be one trust me they wouldnt like it

and it wouldnt go as expected

Also women have more trouble confirming to their social role nowadays

women are evolutionarily speaking have always been caretakers, food makers etc. etc.

If you don’t redirect the values in public consciousness, it’ll fall into what we see now

this is why they usually become nannys, secretaries, chefs etc. etc.

some stay as a housewife which is great and in my opinion the best for the family and children

The feminism I admire is in the Middle East

Female soldiers in northern Syria

traditional feminism?

Uhh, I don’t know if it would fall under that

feminism in general strives for gender equality

thats traditional feminism

also

Women have been, evolutionarily speaking, caretakers.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5127/jep.026912

In hunter-gatherer societies, women gathered and took care of kids, whereas, men cooperatively hunted.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1069397106297529

So, they often make career choices that make less money and sometimes, even no money. Women, therefore, naturally thrive under jobs such as nursing or even abstinence of jobs altogether in the pursuit of taking care of offspring. The fact that women tend to choose fewer STEM careers is not the result of cultural prejudice because a study done in countries (where there’s higher national gender equality) found that sex differences in the magnitude of relative academic strengths and pursuit of STEM degrees rose.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797617741719

They aren’t decadent whiny suburbanites like western feminists, they’re actually taking up arms and participating in war

i do not think they should be in the army during wartime

who is left to protect the country for other than women and children? who is gonna take care of children if women also join armies

I don’t think they should either but it’s still admirable

meh