lemme show you your quote

that part does talk abt victimization

but the next part doesn’t ...

🧍🏻‍♀️

huh?

that's what you quoted

no...

not my fault that you quoted victimization numbers

...

did u even read what i quoted 🧍🏻‍♀️

.

so just gonna start lying now?

that 25.3 number comes from Appendix 6

which is titled ```Estimates and standard errors for figure 4: Rate of violent victimization, by poverty level and race or Hispanic origin, 2008–2012```

violent victimization

ur literally citing an entirely different part in the source

holy fuck you're bad at admitting when you're wrong

do you know what appendix means?

there’s a reason they’re divided by points

the appendix is aggregating the data cited elsewhere in the study

so when the abstract/methodology &c. mentions a 25.3 figure, you'll find it in a given appendix too, with more data

so for this case that section is appendix 6

which is titled

```Estimates and standard errors for figure 4: Rate of violent victimization, by poverty level and race or Hispanic origin, 2008–2012
```

ur quoting victim rates

from a paper about victims

https://crime-data-explorer.fr.cloud.gov/explorer/national/united-states/crime

here's a good source to show you're wrong too

as the BJS shows, whites do tend to be victimized more at every income level

but the same is not true of offenders

can someone give me pic perms 🙏🏻

the UCR/NIBRS mimics that

just say the page number

this dude is the dumbest shit alive

lmao ur stupid

you didn't even know what you were citing

this is adorable

your source doesn't even use the word "offence"

I just want to find the staff chat

<:emoji_27:767137083579433021>

!rank