even not arguing a source, logically these people are workers since they got laid off they need it to support themselves while other people in poverty are most likely there for their own faults such as dropping out

since drop out rates are increasing which is a result of fatherlessness

since overall poverty is most likely caused by fatherlessness

lol

you think poverty is voluntary 💀

i guess they didnt site the study

and i mean how is what they say false

everything has bias whether u like it or not

but how is what i say false

never said it was voluntary i said they put themselves in that situation

drop out rates are increasing so its their choice to drop out while studies show and analysis's show that welfare does hurt them

https://www.heritage.org/welfare/report/how-welfare-undermines-marriage-and-what-do-about-it

as shown here the graphs and links which they cite war on poverty has greatly effected marriage

and when you have a negative effect on marriage the child will not turn out great

if u respond i wont respond bc its going to be some dumbfuck incoherent response so when i go into vc we can talk about it

how deos fatherlessness cause poverty and crime? i know it does but dont get how. can a mother not make up for missing father? maybe a teacher or coach?

ill explain in a sec

@frankus indian reincarnation Statistically and studies prove that children without fathers will commit crime and repeat what their fathers did result in a cycle. Now with mothers, single mothers are poor because theres only one income role and they cant care for the kid and do both resulting in poverty.

So not only does the father fuck with their income but it also fucks up the kid

also they got shit genes

half they genes from a mother fucka who 'bandon his keed

gene change from evolutionary adaption take a centuries, poverty in 20th 21st century US isnt enough to affect genes

not true

if we killed everyone with blue eyes in a genocide, there would be a lot fewer blue eyed next generaton

yea its not genes its the war on poverty, their fatherlessness and poverty rates were 4x better during jim crows

so this started in less than 100 years

genes do not take centuries to have impact

except theres no evidence this was the case bc this happened in literally a span of 30 years so u need evidence that this happened to every black family for 30 years

when it was the war on poverty which separated families

"no evidence"

give me evidence this is the case

stupid people like yourself love just dismissing other idea by 1 strawman

2 ignore evidence

right

ok if im wrong prove me wrong, u cant call me stupid then provide no evidence

if you dont provide evidence u lost

no

alright

u just make claim

dont get to assume you are correct

and dont dump some stupid ass links

what do u want me to provide as evidence