i was saying that using your logic all these awful things could be consider “not big deals” because they dont affect many people

yea u were trying to make a point of hypocrisy

and im saying it didnt

and no im showing how we manage situations based on how much it affects people

i’m done all you do is argue semantics and shit.

kek

i have better things to do

nah you just strawmanned

you mean sitting in ur car?

gotcha

i’m in a road trip

and i don’t want to debate

then why did u respond

r u retarded?

that was a low effort strawman try again another time

what

and no it wasnt semantics we werent arguing what I said you were trying to tell me what i was arguing.

You are trying to say my argument was that it doesnt affect many people

While i said multiple times that my argument was to show how we manage a situation and how we blow it out of proportion.

thats not semantics

thats a fallacy dipshit

all u did was strawman and insult my argument

then u whine and crap urself like a baby and claim im arguing semantics

when u cant shutup for 2 seconds for me to tell you how its a strawman

jesus christ

go outside

lmfao

nah

too early

gunna go shoot my bow and bb gun later tho

Cat vs dog

Dog always wins technically

@Leat Fingies nice response tho really shows how fucking stupid u r kek

@beni dog wins by automatic

lel

dogs r so great

so loyal

i just want to punt a cat out a window

@Leat Fingies if u want a suggest for a debate i suggest u address an entire argument instead of specifically cherry picking one part of the argument and making it ur entire rebuttal

ur rebuttal was a strawman and a cherry pick

If the debate was about lockdown, more people will die and lose their jobs if lockdowns are not lifted

thats 2 whole fallacies

yes ofc