Message from @Hellishfish
Discord ID: 796111752009744477
do you like wasting my time?
if you are not willing to discuss the right way, its a waste of time to even be here
GG @menelaos28, you just advanced to level 1!
don't interupt a discussion to add something completely irrelevant and dont insult other people to name a few ways you could improve
There is no right way if you want servers that follow this criteria go join capoliean club
yeah you are probably right, maybe I shouldnt be here, I didnt realize what the condition under which you guys discuss are
Maybe your too thin skinned to discuss
discuss what?
or maybe i dont want to waste my time with insults, but rather to exchange valid opinions
ill debate you
gimmie an issue
nah its alright, ill just be careful with whom I engage with
maybe some other time
theres somoen called @ ad homindem or somethong liek that who had lotta studies showing correlation between race and low IQ
i have some of his stuff
Now THIS is some quality scientific racism.
Race IQ is racist lol
The left is truly not operating within this reality
Mate. Tell me what the biological basis for significantly different intelligences is between people with different melanin concentrations. You can’t, because our brains aren’t that different.
What
Heritability constants?
Gene variance?
You think every human has the same IQ lol?
frankly i dont care about IQ
Did I say that every human has the same iq?
But the fact you can muster the courage to simplify pyschoanyalyic data to just “ Mealalin concentration” without being absurdly embarrassed is amazing
Here ill give you studies you groveling commie
An SAT test is not psychoanalytic data and the fact you’re calling it that is laughable
I don’t want more of your racism. I want what i asked for. Show me the significant brain differences that would result it significant IQ differences between “races”.
who mentioned SAT scores lol
Starting with the mental gymnastics early eh
> Recent psychometric meta-analyses have clearly shown that g loadings correlate highly with measures of heritability. te Nijenhuis and Grimen (2007) show that g loadings of subtests correlate perfectly with these subtests’ heritability coefficients. Moreover, te Nijenhuis and Franssen (2010) show that inbreeding depression correlates .85 with g loadings. This strongly suggests that g loadings and heritability coefficients may be interchangeable. This in turn suggests that the high correlation between g loadings and group differences could imply that mean group differences have a substantial genetic component.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3a05/d62fd2a8a2f67ca4d5e19ae1c95c0a35f9ad.pdf
It’s literally in the source that the guy cited that I made that original comment on.
g loadings is what you measure for
Cool im not that guy
might want to switch your argumentation style
No, dont’t give me this dog shit. I only want what I’m asking for.
alright were done here
Cool, saved some time.