Guys this is completely derailing the conversation <@&786032854261170206>

<:pepelaughingemote:767137824998686751>

<:emoji_17:767136807166410772> <:emoji_17:767136807166410772> <:emoji_17:767136807166410772>

Yeah I know

OH LORD HAVE MERCY

Imma about to smack somebody

The charlie situation is unrelatable to abortion

so we're talking about moral philosophy, they're establishing what each other believes when it comes to morals and testing if they would be consistent, if you don't like it, there are other channels to go to to talk about something else

But the situation is a trick situation

no, it isn't

you just don't comprehend it

Oh well thank you for telling me what I can't and can comprehend

I greatly appreciate that

no worries bud

'you should *never* kill innocent people'
'you should kill an innocent person here'

You should never kill and innocent child in the womb

Grapistan has a inconsistent moral framework

Grape is a 16 year old boy

What basic moral framework?

@Cthuluwu a fellow threshold deontologist WidePeepoHappy

<:emoji_96:771479021275447296> <:emoji_96:771479021275447296> <:emoji_96:771479021275447296>

these emote names are garbage OMEGALUL

"pepelaughingemote"

<@&786032854261170206> what are y'all's thoughts on the IP conflict? 🤔

<:OMEGALUL:715345729505460274>

this will be a good meme

I hate you

<:emoji_63:771473066500292688>

<:emoji_63:771473066500292688>

GG @BlaKaligula, you just advanced to level 1!

<:emoji_31:767137189225431111> tfw no IP conflict discourse <:emoji_31:767137189225431111>

it's now our VC

<:PeepoHappy:762361890147795044>

We chased away the nazis peeposad

our friend furher should be back soon

<:PeepoHappy:762361890147795044>

hey friends

@Jregs Friend <:FeelsWeirdMan:719300836991303722>

Hey friend

<:emoji_73:771477649976721439>

<:pepohappy:562740332442419220>