Message from @Maw
Discord ID: 779533822865702954
I don't believe he has to cover anything for a prosecution. lol
Generally people only pay legal fees in civil cases if I'm not mistaken, and even then it's rare as you have to usually prove bad faith litigation.
Usually it's defendants that sue for costs.
And it's semi-rare to actually go through.
Hughes v Benjamin is a good example of suing for costs and proving bad faith litigation.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.479687/gov.uscourts.nysd.479687.52.0.pdf You can find the final opinion and order here.
```Benjamin argues that Hughes brought this suit to silence her political opponents and critics and to generate publicity for herself. Motivation, like all the Fogerty factors, is not dispositive, but “the presence of improper motivation in bringing a lawsuit or other bad faith conduct weighs heavily in favor of an award of costs and fees.” Baker v. Urb. Outfitters, Inc., 431 F. Supp. 2d 351, 357 (S.D.N.Y. 2006),aff’d, 249 F. App’x 845 (2d Cir. 2007).```
```Here, the Court has little difficulty concluding that Hughes’s dual goals in bringing her baseless suit were to inflict financial harm on Benjamin and to raise her own profile in the process. Improper or bad faith motivations are generally difficult to discern, as litigants often have a variety of objectives and may obscure their baser ones behind a veil of legitimate-sounding claims. In this case, however, Hughes openly discussed her improper motivations on both Twitter and her website. Indeed, Hughes admitted to potentially hundreds of thousands of followers that she intended to (i) “bankrupt” Benjamin (Doc. No. 43 at 2), (ii) stymy his attempts to crowdfund his legal costs (id. at 2–3), and (iii) use copyright laws to silence her political opponents and critics (id. at 4). Other posts, including her public boasting about the legal dispute on her social media accounts (even describing her complaint as a “[C]hristmas present” for Benjamin) and her public belittlement and celebrity-style feuding with Benjamin (id. at 5–7), strongly suggest that Hughes intended to sensationalize the litigation to elevate her own public profile and achieve a secondary financial gain. Together, then, Hughes’s public comments reveal an intent to abuse the legal system in order to further a personal agenda that had little to do with the Copyright Act```
Obviously this is particularly in the case of copyright, but I believe the idea remains the same across the spectrum.
Bad faith litigation in effort to cause monetary harm to someone is usually something that the court may solve if they're able to prove the claim.
I might be from Wisconsin and Ever's supports a assault weapons buy back I might have a 14 year old with an ar-15 hunting this weekend. Well maybe it could happen. The .243 that he killed his last deer with has not been reliable. So maybe.... suck it Evers.
The taxpayer covers prosecution though.
(Though not defense all the time)
totally agree ...only reason i brought up is it does happen i see it more with person being released after wrongful confinement
no refund on defense lawyer
Don't believe so, no.
And it seems mildly risky to take the free attorney provided imho.
Well, taxpayer-funded defense attorney.
what no faith with public defenders
If I were looking at potentially sitting in prison for the rest of my life? No.
lol
lol...you might if you use one for anything
I beat 2 strikes and Susanville St Penn with a PD.
I'm extremely happy to hear that!
Me too!
Lol
I had to be"involved" to be sure.
i think the name should be changed to public interpers not defenders
Mine was a G
Now I just stay out of trouble.
Good!
good idea best defense
@osok, you just advanced to level 4!
I think Kyle will serve sometime. Sets a dangerous precedent to just let him walk. Next day we would have ARs all over the country.
@Benny2Toes, you just advanced to level 2!
he has already
Well he's not walking, he's on 2m bond.
Kinda far from walking.
He still risks life in prison.
Meant convicted
Everyone says he will best the charges. I dont see that.