Message from @Maw

Discord ID: 788080522374021141


2020-12-14 16:26:31 UTC  

OR.

2020-12-14 16:26:32 UTC  

an exception is age 16+ and its a rifle or shotgun, not a SBS

2020-12-14 16:26:50 UTC  

read 29.304

2020-12-14 16:26:55 UTC  

sheesh

2020-12-14 16:27:38 UTC  

Human seem to have some propensity for putting themselves into dangerous situations with a disregard for bodily consequences.

2020-12-14 16:27:38 UTC  

Ah yes.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771200849351147581/788079768317984768/unknown.png

2020-12-14 16:27:40 UTC  

read the highlighted part, what you are saying is wrong

2020-12-14 16:27:43 UTC  

Not about hunting.

2020-12-14 16:27:59 UTC  

why is a 17 year old totally omitted?

2020-12-14 16:28:45 UTC  

Because it's about hunting. If it's omitted, it is therefore in compliance with the idea of hunting.

2020-12-14 16:28:46 UTC  

29.304(3)(b) Restrictions on possession or control of a firearm. No person 14 years of age or older but under 16 years of age may have in his or her possession or control any firearm unless....

2020-12-14 16:29:01 UTC  

>Hunting<

2020-12-14 16:29:07 UTC  

no mention whatsoever about a 17yr old

2020-12-14 16:29:35 UTC  

What in the world has happened? We had GUN Club in high school where you brought your rifle to school. Not one person ever misbehave with their rifles to hurt or kill anyone. WTH is wrong today?

2020-12-14 16:29:38 UTC  

29.304  Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.

2020-12-14 16:30:01 UTC  

think logically for a moment, why are 17yr olds totally omitted?

2020-12-14 16:30:11 UTC  

@Saxson Polarization and subversion

2020-12-14 16:30:16 UTC  

Because they're not as regulated when it comes to hunting?

2020-12-14 16:30:25 UTC  

you are wrong sorry

2020-12-14 16:30:38 UTC  

Because this statute is literally talking about hunting?

2020-12-14 16:30:53 UTC  

hunting and? then what does it say

2020-12-14 16:31:04 UTC  

I mean, it seems to me that I'm right according to a judge (twice), a DA, a prosecutor, and more!

2020-12-14 16:31:10 UTC  

use of firearms

2020-12-14 16:31:18 UTC  

and illocutionary intent of law, @Maw

2020-12-14 16:31:19 UTC  

beyond even possession it says control

2020-12-14 16:31:52 UTC  

No, the statute it was linked from is entirely based in the idea of minors in possession of firearms.

2020-12-14 16:31:56 UTC  

its the law here sorry if u dont like it

2020-12-14 16:32:15 UTC  

This is not the statute you read when you're looking at possession of weapons in a general sense.

2020-12-14 16:32:18 UTC  

So now you are a judge, @Ghostdog ???

2020-12-14 16:32:53 UTC  

its well established law here, find a ruling on it if u can, without other circumstances

2020-12-14 16:33:06 UTC  

"without other circumstances"

2020-12-14 16:33:18 UTC  

The level of mental pretzels here is ridiculous.

2020-12-14 16:33:23 UTC  

like someone declared not mentally competent yes

2020-12-14 16:33:31 UTC  

No rulings exist without circumstance. Its why you have judges.

2020-12-14 16:34:27 UTC  

@Ghostdog Does your state have a law prohibiting anyone below 18 to be in possession of a firearm?

2020-12-14 16:34:33 UTC  

does such a law exist?

2020-12-14 16:34:56 UTC  

its one of the reasons you can be tried as an adult at 17 here, it even states it again within the statute

2020-12-14 16:35:19 UTC  

the law only allows rifles and shotguns, not all weapons

2020-12-14 16:35:27 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771200849351147581/788081733718638662/unknown.png

2020-12-14 16:35:32 UTC