You have to prove your case

There have been enough things come forward that he should and needs to continue getting to the bottom of this

"Operative in North Carolina congressional race arrested in ‘ballot harvesting’ case - Los Angeles Times" https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-nc-election-fraud-charge-20190227-story.html

@Jorgen Johnson then why not take steps to secure the elections trump had four years. Also btw the election until proven otherwise was secure, an allegation is not evidence

A state trump won

There are enough “allegations” to continue investigating

@james j what happened when Trump closed of travelers from China

That doesn’t mean the burden shifts to Biden @thebrodys

@busillis nothing , people elope complained he didn’t close down Europe at the same time. (Where most our cases came from)

He was decried as xenophobic

I don’t think it’s Bidens “Burden”, but for him to completely dismiss 74 million people who have concerns will haunt his presidency if he’s the one who’s inaugurated on January 20th

@james j do read this: https://www.archives.gov/files/electoral-college/state-officials/presidential-election-brochure.pdf

“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.”

Unknown

Because you can't make change to something with no proof that it is broken, now he has all the proof in the world

@Jorgen Johnson, you just advanced to level 12!

It's very convenient when you can make your own facts

Most of the government including democrats approved of it. Trump did turn it into a China vs us thing. @busillis

@james j not at the very beginning

@thebrodys but who is dismissing anything? Only the courts are doing that. Almost every case

@busillis trump didn’t even implement a real lockdown. Americans could still go back and forth. If Trump wanted a real lockdown and not just one for show he would have closed us off to Europe and stopped all travel to China not just Chinese nationals @busillis

You can’t shift the burden to someone else when you are making the allegation

https://youtu.be/YxlphqKO_gE

Yeah they criticized it because it targeted Chinese nationals but not Americans, that means its a more for show lockdown

Also the only evidence people use to say the dead criticized trump was like one tweet

Trump should have locked down the entire country

@james j didn't know that. That was only Chinese nationals.

@james j personally I don't agree with lock downs.

Except that Americans are not going to abide by a complete lockdown just like they are not wearing masks

From all countries

Should have would have could have

I mean travel bans to all countries not a lockdown @busillis

Travel restrictions area lockdowns

?

@MatiLuc yeah it only targeted Chinese nationals, Americans were still going back and forth

@james j, you just advanced to level 18!

@busillis i think in the beginning was necessary... nobody knew what was this virus like.. alot of misinformation.. everyone was panicking..

No I mean not just shut down Chinese nationals I mean all travel to and from China and other countries

it does not really matter if you lockdown if state senators are going to put covid patients in nursing homes

Including Europe

@MatiLuc so in the beginning the most powerful intelligence apparatus in the history of the world did not know what was happening in China, yeah people with access to social media did?

Yeah because there was nowhere else to put them . Trump didn’t use the war powers act to open up hotels to take in people after they leave the hospital, nor were nursing homes equipped with ppe because Trump did not get companies to make them @Jorgen Johnson

Yes people knew that people i china were dying... from what or how .. or why . No one knew