so I just watched Ayyadurai's testimony in the AZ hearing and I don't know what he is thinking? https://youtu.be/bB2dTjJGdpE

They all should at least sign off on respecting the constitution and not interfere with elections or govt officials

@TW20, you just advanced to level 2!

Thank you Watching the Watchers 🙂

one he gives another possibility other than the vote swapping and why I casually disregards it is beyond me

Interfering with elections and govt officials? You mean asking the government questions for transparency?

I think the good dr disproved himself in testimony

Asking the government for transparency is one thing, interference is another

Interference in what way?

two, far as I can tell his model assumes a uniform distribution from precinct to precinct, that is regardless of size he assumes that the percentages go according to his model but that doesn't necessarily have to be the case in fact one would expect much greater variance in the smaller precincts

I'm singularly unimpressed with his presentation as evidence of election fraud

What do you see with how media suppresses one govt ideology over another, covering up scandals

I clipped his kraken views from the last video

or we count the actual physical ballots like in GA and make sure the totals match what the computers told us ... which they did for GA

I dont think a news outlet worth much is going to cover a scandal they cant factually verify

Yeah meglide that's basically what he said if dominion tallies match hand recount what I am saying is wrong which is weird caus we did that haha

For example, the .pdf images were deleted by the tabulators as instructed by their supervisors, according to Dr Shiva

yes and in the Kraken lawsuit itself it says one remedy would be to hand count the paper ballots which occurred BEFORE the lawsuit was filed ... it's like someone killed the Kraken before it was released

The congressman testifying in MI said no hand recounts are useless then kept saying things hand recounts would disprove its odd

Hand counts are to prove if they are legal votes, is this correct

The recount is to find the legal voted

hand count will catch if the computer is swapping votes

It depends like dominion machines are electronic but they print a paper the voter can check their vote and then its locked up like a paper ballot so if you recount the paper vs the computer total and it matches it rules out lots of the things they say

so this whole algorithm in the computer swapping votes goes out the window if the hand count matches the computer

Lots of stuff does like weighted ballots foreign hackers

Yes that's correct meglide

now what you're left with is a possibility that some one or ones stuffed the ballot box IF you want to claim election fraud

But hes like no recounts you cant trust them you have to assume shenanigans at every level what haha

further they stuffed the ballot box in such a way that they didn't mess up the down line races ... remember Republicans picked up seats in the House and held on to most of the Senate seats ... then you got to look at where could these ballots have been stuffed at ... and how did nobody detect it or come forward with some evidence

It's a fish gallop of what ifs but they dont finish the thought

Gish damn you autocorrect

It's like dude I'm trying to take you seriously when you said you're a tech guy and then didnt know what a white hat is and kept misusing ethernet cord

@meglide great point

I've got some mad respect for michigan Republicans after whatever GA and AZ were supposed to be

Why is AG Barr. Saying this now.? Is this his vengeance against trumpism

He had to say something

Michigan Senate, Legislators appear to take this to investigation with a forensic audit
Barr is being pressured by someone

@TW20, you just advanced to level 3!

@Dedkraken . He could have said we still investigating. Cant confirm or denied anything

But hes not investigating lol

Thank you Watching the Watchers 🙂