I’m sure there are, just as there were good hardworking people in the KGB, but IMO they don’t justify its existence. These organizations operate completely outside the purview of the constitution. For example, I can’t find the constitutional authority granted to the executive to dose unknowing citizens, who think they’re buying a hooker, with lsd to study its effects.

NV has some real issues

NV is not named in TX's lawsuit, I don't think

The Cleanest Remedy would be to have a New Election. I doubt that can be done before Noon Jan 20th.

neither is AZ

No they have their own thing going on because it is strictly Clark County.

the TX lawsuit names PA, GA, MI, and WI ... I believe

They have even extended their elections

Unfortunately, to change Federal Election Deadline would require amending the US Constitution.

Clark county had an issue from them closing down. A lot of the the votes were from non residents.

electors cast their votes on Mon Dec 14th

No their state elections

I know. Some Legal Scholars argue the true deadline is Jan 20th. That is debatable.

Correct. They're moving it from December to January

Jan 6th I thought is what some are arguing

Yes. Most are and it is probably the correct Date IMO.

I don't know exactly what day but maybe they're doing it for NV to be able to have theirs around the same time.

@BoxyPunkChick, you just advanced to level 3!

It's hard because one place can give one date, and another source can give another. 😂

I think SCOTUS will rule before this coming Mon (including not even taking the case) and it won't be in TX's favor ... that will pretty much be the end of it ... it's possible that there is an objection in Congress on Jan 6th but I can't see Congress failing to certify the electors vote

anyone seen any evidence that trump is moving troops?

Jan 6th is the actual Date that the designation of "President Elect" is determined.

I have not heard of any action to do that. I heard people asking him to. If there is evidence I would not doubt that would be censored immediately.

You may be correct.

@BoxyPunkChick yes the censorship is annoying

What's more annoying is that they claim to be a platform not a publisher. Yet they still do it.

Makes me wanna slap them. 😂

"National Security" can be a fancy title for censorship!

"Patriot Act" isn't for spying on US Citizens. It is for finding the enemy.

Worst thing is that its so blatant, they don't even try to hide it anymore

Well we still were spied on.

They don't care to.

Why would they? Anyone speaks out, they close their accounts. They sue them for slander.

It's disgusting, especially when it comes to the election.

Has anyone seen the new rules on YT for discussion involving the election?

covered in Wed's livestream ... right at the beginning

They added to it.

oh wonderful ... of course they did

I love how You Tube has stated this is their "Historical" Policy on Presidential Elections. They didn't follow that in 2016.

I don’t think the details of their rules are important. They remove who they want and don’t have to answer to anybody.

One of the major problems with the Law in 230. Is it gave then all of this Protection without assigning any Responsibilities to it. IMO