He's a russian dreamer now

@SoonMrWick lol#

have you not seen any of the evidence or hearings? You dont need to wear a tinfoil hat to see some stuff that needs to be looked into.

@Gypsy you were talking about scotus ruling something unconstitutional. They only case about the constitution that was brought forth was dismissed on laches due to them not doing anything about it for up to a year when they had a chance .

Trump should pardon him and Assange. Then pardon himself just so AOC goes nuts on Twitter lol.

@rip.lul the hearings are not court cases. That’s just unverifiable stories

Here. Ill post his 2nd favorite lawyer

So you admit you just avoided my topic and started talking about what you want to discuss.


And you accuse me of deflection hahaha

https://youtu.be/NAzCECx8XeE

Clown lawyer

He even has a gold and silver ad. Pimpin' himself out for that 🍞

I thought James was 20 but I am reassessing. New speculation, 17.

lol

@Gypsy I was addressing scotus and the constitution. You deflected and started asking me to name good things about trump

@Gypsy I think you hate actually addressing points without deflection

https://www.broadcastify.com/listen/feed/22471

You were avoiding my topic so you could rant about your ideas lol. Screenshot says it all. I discuss one topic you’re like “ what about voter fraud”

Its constitution, not constipation. I know you get them confused.

Stop calling people kids.

@SoonMrWick equally irrelevant to conservatives

Democrats*

If it’s a fact is it still insulting?

@Gypsy scotus was the topic

Yes.

Scotus not ruling in favor of Trump was the topic @Gypsy

I just wanted a ruling for the future 😂

That’s not the topic I was discussing at all. That’s your topic.

You can use the truth derogatorily.

Example

Yeah like I said if they want a ruling in the future they should bring it up in a timely fashion and not weaponize it invalidate votes @Gypsy

I don’t know if I agree but I respect you’re the one who makes that decision

Saw that<a:groupkek:763107530229809174>

Again, just you deflecting from the topic I brought up.

You wouldn't call a mentally disabled person an R-word, no matter how true it may be.

Why wouldn’t they rule on a case or it is brought up appropriately @Gypsy

Cowards

I think this shit should be looked at. Am I a tinfoil boy?

This pairing scotus as some incompetent branch as if they didn’t do their job is just a right wing conspiracy to deal with then fact they lost the election

A retard?

No, buts that because we use the R word to describe people who we think are behaving like idiots not developmentally disabled. When it only described the latter it was acceptable.